Home /
Search 🔍
the Site

Problem? Solution? Chime right in!
-- this is a no-registration site.


"PP Compatibility With Chromic Acid Solutions"


I'm the chemist in a hard chrome plating shop. We need to replace some tank liners and were considering using polypropylene. I did an accelerated destruction test on a number of PVC samples and a polypro sample. I immersed a piece of each of the samples in ~90% H2SO4 saturated with chromic acid heated them up (in beakers) to 190 °C overnight. The next day, the PP sample was the only one that had anything left to it. I then tested the welds on this product by immersing welded strips in solutions containing 500 g/l CrO3, 5 g/l H2SO4 and varying amounts of wetting agent ranging from 4 ml/l to 20 ml/l. These were placed in beakers and heated at 90 °C for about a week. That's about 35 deg higher than our plating tanks so any reaction rate was increased by around 10. The test strips and their welds came out looking great and not one hour ago I gave my boss the okay to try this for a tank liner.

Then I checked your guys' archived mail on this and discovered (letters # 4428 and 5843) that "NO, NO,NO, I CAN'T use polypro." Were my bench tests a waste of time? Is there any standardized test protocol (ASTM,military or whatever) that I can use. Are there any other materials that we can try?

Thank you very much,

Peter H. MIllican
power engineering - Denver, CO USA


The ideal lining material for chrome is PVDF, but it is very expensive and rarely used.

PVC is an acceptable lining material despite poor performance in your test. This was probably due to the fact that PVC is only good to about 150 - 160 °F, not the 90 deg. C (194 deg. F) that you tested it at. It is customary to put a double thickness band extending a few inches above and below the solution level for longer service life.

Rumor has it that polypropylene does not stand up to strong oxidizing agents like chromic acid and nitric acid. I've never seen it used on a chrome plating tank, so I can't relate personal experiences there, although I have seen it fail rapidly in strong nitric acid service. I suspect, but do not know, that had your coupons been only partially immersed you would have seen deterioration at the solution level.

Let us know if it worked, however. It's always nice to eliminate a baseless prejudice.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey


Our hard chrome tank is 1" Polypro. We do not see any evidence of deterioration. We have also used PP with other oxidizers (25% nitric acid) for many years without problem.

jeffrey holmes
Jeffrey Holmes, CEF
Spartanburg, South Carolina


There we go then. Another urban legend bites the dust. Thanks!

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey

First of two simultaneous responses -- 2005

Hi Peter,

Re testing, it's not only the concentration and temperature that one should expose samples to but also TIME ... and just by heating something up excessively doesn't prove a point, to my way of thinking.

I would definitely not use any 'welded' polyoelefin ... BUT were a size available from a rotational moulder, then that should give some good years of service.

Welding is an ART ... ! Just because someone has 'welded' for years doesn't mean they are any good. And particularly with polyoelefins, a standard 'compressor' is totally nbg due to the inclusion of macro particles of oil. At one point some Companies used to use dessicated air.

Also, go down to the 'library' please .... you might find something there of use to you re chromic.

Have a gander, too, at # 6194, 8270, 20279 as well as 7132 and 8169 plus 9132,

The above might swing you to other directions, I sure hope so, anyhow !

freeman newton portrait
Freeman Newton [dec]
(It is our sad duty to advise that Freeman passed away
April 21, 2012. R.I.P. old friend).


Second of two simultaneous responses -- 2005

I would not use welded PP in a chrome tank. The weld is under stress and it absolutely will pick up cracks from the very gradual loss of the plasticisers.
The cheapest good alternative that I found was a 3/16 vinyl liner with a teflon skirt at the air liquid interface and a loose double lining on the bottom to keep any parts from poking a hole in the bottom.
I do not have hearburn over a well supported and thick pvc liner. I would not use less than 1/2", but that is me. I have used Korseal lined tanks, but it was not worth what it cost which might have been caused by the additive in the proprietary chrome solution that we used. I have used rotationally molded PE tanks that were very very well supported with great luck.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida

finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread SEARCH for Threads about ... My Topic Not Found: Start NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Chemicals &
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software

About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2021 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA