finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedAdvertiseForum
topic 4295

Watts vs Woods Nickel Strike


(2000)

Q. My name is John Sartor and I am a process manager for a medium to large plating facility in northwest Ohio. I started out with this company as a racker 7 years ago and worked my way up. The things I know about plating are based only on my experiences in this company. That's just to let you know that I am not a rocket scientist in this industry and my technical expertise is limited to my experiences. My company is contemplating a process change and I would like some comments as to the pros and cons of this change. We do most of our plating for the automotive industry (fuel rails, brake lines, steering components, etc.) The processes our particular plant use are the alkaline zinc and alkaline zinc nickel alloy. Some parts we plate (fuel senders for one) are a combination of low carbon steel and stainless steel tubing. Consequently we have to use a nickel strike before plating for adhesion purposes. We have always used the Wood's nickel strike for this purpose. We have had success using this strike but occasionally experience problems. The ability to manipulate this bath as we experience these problems is limited. One of our other plants which plates chrome and electroless nickel use the Watts' nickel strike. The ability to control it with buffers I am told makes it easier to use. I am told it has better throwing also. We have contemplated going to a Watts' strike some time ago but was dissuaded when my plant chemist was under the impression that the drag-ins of sulfates to our plater would be poisonous. One day my plant manager was talking to our chemical salesman from Macdermid Inc. [a finishing.com supporting advertiser] and asked him about the sulfates being poisonous to the platers. He called his company's chemists and asked them about that and they said it was nonsense and as a matter of fact that one of the additives we put in our bath contains sulfates. To make a long story short I would like some comments about the pros and cons of switching to a Watts' strike. The strike we are contemplating is a modified (I'm told) Watt's strike consisting of

- NiSO4 @ 15oz/gal
- NiCl2 @ 15 oz/gal
- H2S04 @ 5%
- HBO3 @ 1 oz/gal
- Temp: 105 degrees

Sincerely,

John Sartor
- Toledo, Ohio


(2000)

A. On stainless steel, Wood's nickel is the strike of choice for the best adhesion, for most platers. It is not idiot-proof and requires some carbon filtration and some dummy to keep it optimal. Because of the very low pH and very high chloride content is will attack the steel more than the modified Watts strike will. This is not a problem with most, repeat, most parts.

Consider going to a Sulfamate strike. It is very close to your Watts strike but uses sulfamate nickel vs. nickel sulfate. The pH must be controlled! Since it is several orders of magnitude less acid than the Wood's strike, it lays down the metal considerably faster. You will have to pay more attention to the etch cycle than you do with the Wood's strike because it is nowhere near as self activating on the SS. It is also a room temp or very slightly elevated bath temp.

The Wood's strike is a more hazardous bath than the other two from the standpoint of acid.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


(2002)

Q. What would be a typical Wood's nickel bath composition?

Robert Sachs
- Morrisburg, Ontario, Canada


(2002)

A. Hi, Robert. You'll find the formulation for Wood's Nickel and the operating conditions in the Preparation article by Steve Rudy in the Metal Finishing Guidebook, but it's basically 2 pounds per gallon nickel chloride and 1 quart per gallon Hydrochloric Acid. Good luck.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey


(2007)

Q. Wood's Strike is highly acidic and Iron build up is faster. We have checked that iron also get co-deposited in thin nickel strike deposit. Can anybody suggest the method for removal of Iron impurities. What should be the maximum permissible limit for such impurities.

Bath being highly acidic, it appears impractical to eliminate Iron by raising pH after oxidation.

D.T.Thakur
- Mumbai, India


April 12, 2012

Q. How does Wood's nickel and Watts' nickel react on SS parts?

Archana elangovan
- India


April 14, 2012

A. Hi, Archana.

Please invest at least a few sentences on your question because I don't know what you are asking. But as James noted, Wood's nickel strike is the standard (and usually the best) strike for stainless steel. John seemed to be looking for something that wouldn't attack steel as rapidly.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey


March 16, 2015

Q. May I ask with the formula of Woods Nickel Strike,
2 pounds per gallon of nickel chloride & 1 pound per gallon of hydrochloric acid; my question: is that a gallon of distilled water for the formula please?

GEOFF COOK
- COOROY QLD AUSTRALIA


March 2015

A. Yes, cousin Geoff, but always proceed from authoritative sources like the one referenced, not directly from the internet where people may not even write a complete sentence in reply -- let alone offer a proper tutorial introduction to the subject, complete with the necessary safety instructions :-)

You certainly don't want to build a chlorine gas generation facility while trying to set up a Wood's Nickel Strike tank :-)

Luck and Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView This Week's HOT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.