finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
Serious Education & the most FUN
you can have in metal finishing smiley

No popups, spam, registration or passwords
HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
current topics
topic 35056

Electroless Nickel Plating with Silicon Carbide Particles


2005

Q. Hi,
I am presently doing the Postgraduate project on this topic. I have some difficulties in that I am using the acid hypophosphite bath containing 30 g Nickel Sulphate, 10 g sodium hypophosphite, 10 g sodium acetate, 5 g SiC particles -- and substrate for coating is of mild steel.

I am not getting any coating on the substrate. I want to know why this is happening? I am using the nital etchant to observe the coating, is it an appropriate etchant?

Mahajan Devendra Ashok
Student - Pune


2005

A. You left out the most important parameter -- Temperature! Also what kind of agitation are you using? How are you activating the steel?

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


"Electroless Nickel Plating"
by Wolfgang Riedel

from Abe Books
or
info on Amazon

2005

Q. Hi,
As far as mild steel activation is concerned, I first do surface polishing until I have the mirror-like appearance; then secondly I hold it in 10% NaOH solution which is at 60 °C; after that I wash it with distilled water; then activate with dilute HCl solution; then wash again with distilled water; and then hold it in the bath. Also for SiC particles I washed them with Acetone [linked by editor to product info at Amazon] then with distilled water and then cleaned with 34% HCl solution. The temperature of bath is 90 °C, and speed of agitation is 150 RPM. I am not getting any coating on the substrate. I want to know why this is happening? Also I want to know how much coating thickness should I get if I hold the substrate for 3 hr in that bath?

Mahajan Devendra Ashok [returning]
student - Pune, Maharashtra, India


2005

A. Have you narrowed the problem to:
a) the bath not plating or
b) the metal surface not activating?
Has your bath successfully plated visible amounts of nickel on some other kind of metal other than steel, such as copper wire? If your rinse water was stagnant and became alkaline with drag-over from the NaOH, the rinse after the acid might de-activate the surface. Use new water for that last rinse, and don't rinse very long.

James Swenson
- Los Angeles, California


November 18, 2009

A. You don't mention the bath pH? Commercial electroless solutions usually work in the range of 4.7-4.8
Also you have to agitate SiC powder before adding particles to plating bath. I've done a similar project, personally I am adding my particles to 200 cc bath solution and ultrasonic it for 2 hr before using particles in bath.
The mechanism for deposition Ni-P coatings is pure mechanical so use abrasive paper 800 for entrapping particles and coating.
The rate of deposition depends on Temp, pH and chemical composition of the bath. deposition rate of commercial Ni-P solutions is about 18-25 um/hr. You are using SiC particles in bath it results lower deposition rate.

Ali Sorkhi
- Iran - Tehran



Particle percentage increases to a point, then decreases

2006

Q. Hi
In electroless composite coatings for example Ni-P-SiC, the volume percentage of particles in coating such as SiC or Al2O3 after a maximum value decreases. I want to know why this decreasing occurs.
thanks,

Mahmood Noroozi
university - Iran


2006

A. Two reasons. The grit gets an organic slime on it that is hydrophobic and becomes difficult to occlude onto the part in the electroplated metal. Periodic cleaning in a similar acid with peroxide is sometimes used.
The second reason is that the smallest particles are easiest to plate out, so the plate out rapidly. As their % diminishes, the amount of particles in the plated metal steadily decreases.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


"The Canning Handbook of Surface Finishing Technology"

from Abe Books
or

2006

A. In electroless co-deposition process, the particle flux at the interface available for impingement at the surface and the holding time of the particles at the surface determines their level of incorporation rather than the type and nature of second phase particles added to the electroless plating bath. The impingement of the particle on the substrate is determined by the flux of the particle at the interface. The particle flux at the interface, in turn, is determined by the concentration, size and density of the particle. The holding time is a function of mode of agitation, speed, and particle shape.

The observed increase in the level of incorporation of particles in the electroless Ni-P or Ni-B matrix up to a certain concentration can be ascribed to the increased flux of the particles adjacent to the electrode surface. However, beyond this concentration, there is a possibility of grouping or agglomeration of the particles due to the decrease in the mean distance between them, resulting in settlement of these particles. Such an effect will lead to a leveling off in the flux of the particles that are available at the interface for incorporation in the deposit, causing either a saturation or slight decrease in the level of incorporation.

T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan
T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan
- Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
(ed.note Nov. 2017: The good doctor has a fascinating blog at https://advancementinscience.wordpress.com)


Our electroplating is soft compared to Japanese electroless plating

August 16, 2011

Q. Hi, could anyone give me advise on hardening the nickel silicon carbide coating? is there an alternative to nickel carrier? reason I ask is that we recently ran a test on a standard Japanese motorcycle cylinder vs. the plating we do, and the results were astonishing. The "factory" cylinder measure in at 849 - 973 HV and ours at 366 - 471 HV. I'm to add more of the Kermet that we import as it contains more silicon particles. we are electroplating and as far as I know the "japanese factory" is plating Electrolessly. Advice would be much appreciated.

Didier Bartholome
plating shop - Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa


August 17, 2011

A. You fail to say what kind of nickel you are using to co-deposit the carbide.
Electroless nickel is quite a bit harder than electrolytic nickel. Heat treating makes it even harder.
Co-deposition out of an electroless bath is a lot more difficult than from a normal tank.
Nickel sulfamate is rather soft. Nickel sulfate is quite a bit harder. Hardeners (organics) can be added, but they can be a bit of a problem to control in a co-deposition tank.
Adding sodium tungstanate will also harden the plate, but is another thing to control.
Cobalt sulfate could be used as it is a bit harder than nickel sulfate plating, but it is normally a lot more expensive.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


August 18, 2011

A. The deposit consists of more or less pure nickel with particles of silicon carbide embedded.
The hardness you measure depends on whether your indenter hits a particle of silicon carbide or not.
I would have no confidence in hardness measurements on this type of material.
In any case, hardness is not a reliable predictor of wear, although they are related.

geoff smith
Geoff Smith
Hampshire, England



If you have a question in mind which seems off topic, please Search the Site

ADD a Comment to THIS thread START a NEW threadView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2018 finishing.com, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About finishing.com   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.