Non porous and non conductive coating for stainless steelAugust 21, 2017
Q. I have a 302SS part that we need to apply an electrically insulating coating to, or some other way render the surface non-conducting. A search of the site left hints of ideas but none that jump out as a clear solution for our needs.
More specifically we're trying to apply a non-conductive surface that we can then copper plate (either electroless or electrolytic plating are options). There can be NO electrical connection between the copper layer and the underlying stainless steel, so the non-conductive surface needs to be free of porosity. The copper surface will then be etched to create individual conductors. We'd like the insulating layer to be less than 5 microns in thickness if possible. The entire device will need to be able to withstand temperatures of 350 °C for 24 hours without degradation.
We've extensively researched the use of parylene and numerous polyimide formulations to create a thin coating over the surface. We've made significant progress with a polyimide coating but micropores that lead to shorting between the copper and SS layers remains a challenge.
If there's an surface treatment of the SS that would get us close then I'm fine with coating this with a thin polyimide to give us the robust electrical isolation that we need.
Engineer - Sunnyvale, California, USA
^- Privately contact this inquirer -^
A. Hi Phil. No answers, just food for thought: Electrocoating works by putting parts into an aqueous solution and applying electricity which causes the ions to reduce into a non-conductive paint, which then causes the electricity to flow to any area that is not covered. The deposit thickness is very even, and any pinholes should get covered because of its intrinsic nature. But 5 microns is pretty thin, and 350 °C sounds quite high. If the part could be made of aluminum it could be anodized to non-conductivity, but again, 5 microns isn't much. The people who make exquisite chandeliers do not apply one heavy coat of lacquer but about 5 very highly thinned coats, and that may be guidance towards a pinhole-free surface. Good luck.
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"
August 22, 2017
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
August 24, 2017
A. This is a tricky one! Surely there must be a different way to design your actual component which would avoid this issue?
Bronte - Bradford, West Yorkshire
August 24, 2017
Q. Thanks for the thoughts. Unfortunately the SS core is extremely critical to the function of the device. It provides very specific mechanical characteristics as well as serving as one of the electrical paths for the system, which is why we need total electrical isolation from the plated on copper layer.
I found reference in the literature to "Zirconia Coating on Stainless Steel Sheets from Organozirconium Compounds", which seems to hold promise.
- Sunnyvale, California
August 24, 2017
A. How about PVD? In the same vacuum chamber you can coat an insulating film like TiO2 or alumina and then coat copper without breaking vacuum. Porosity may not be an issue. But one may have to consider issues like diffusion of Cu at 350 °C and breakdown voltage of the insulating layer.H.R. Prabhkara
Bangalore Plasmatek - Bangalore, Karnataka, India
This public forum has 60,000 threads. If your question seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to search the site: