Home /
Search 🔍
the Site

Chime right in! (no registration req'd)


"Required Tin Plating Thickness on Copper?"

Current question:

June 30, 2021 -- this entry appended to this thread by editor in lieu of spawning a duplicative thread

Sir, what is the best electroplating thickness of tin on 0.61 mm thick copper sheet for a tank made to store drinking water with TDS around 200 ppm and pH around 7.

Shekar GK
Engineer - Bangalore

June 2021

A. Hi Shekar. There is rarely a definitive answer to such questions because it depends on the smoothness of the copper sheet, how well its pretreated, what the situation is with the solder lines, and how uniform and robust the tin plating layer is. But we've attached your inquiry to a thread where 3 µm was found inadequate but 5 µm seemed to be adequate ... so that should be at least a starting point.

You might entertain historical tin wiping as an alternative to electroplating (see thread 25553 and thread 29192).

Luck & Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey

Closely related historical postings, oldest first:

September 26, 2012

Q. Hello,

I am a manufacturing engineer workings with our product design team for specifications and sourcing for applications where we require strip plating C110 copper strip with bright tin for a bolt down electrical component. We recently had a concern due to "dog bone" effect (although the edges of application are receiving the minimum specified 5 µm of tin plating, the center of the strip is about 3.5 µm of tin plating).

Unfortunately we have caught the issue after it is too late to send material back for rework. The material is stamped and the end application is connected into application via bolt down on M8 or M5 studs. The material is 1 mm thick copper C110 and then plated. I believe the 5 µm specification is used as a safety factor to assure adequate plating coverage against corrosion. What is an adequate thickness for tin strip plating to protect copper from corrosion? And, what is best testing method to validate? Not to ask too many questions but this is related: For another application where the copper is 0.8 mm thick we use 3 µm minimum of tin plating as adequate coverage. Does the thickness of plating as a barrier to corrosion need to be related to the thickness of the work piece?

Thank You

Matt Yurkanin
Product Designer - Chicago, Illinois, USA

September 28, 2012

A. I don't think that a tin coating of only 3 microns thickness will be sufficient. At this thickness there will probably be pores or small areas of no plate that allow corrosion to occur. If the pretreatment is excellent, than you will probably need a minimum of 5 microns.

Dog-bone effects can be minimized by good racking and or shielding techniques.

Lyle Kirman
consultant - Cleveland Heights, Ohio

October 2, 2012

thumbs up sign Thank you for your response Lyle. Our comparative salt spray results after 48 hours per ASTM B117 [affil. link to spec at Techstreet] agree with your assessment that 5 µm minimum should be used as protective barrier thickness specification.

Q. Related, does it matter what thickness the workpiece when specifying the minimum protective plating thickness? Specifically we run parts that are 0.6 mm to 1.2 mm thick C110 for the base material and we vary plating thickness based upon thickness of base material. It just seems to me that if 3 µm on 1.0 mm thick copper is not enough to eliminate effects of porosity then 3 µm on 0.8 mm thick copper would also not be enough.

Matt Yurkanin [returning]
- Chicago, Illinois

finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread SEARCH for Threads about ... My Topic Not Found: Start NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Chemicals &
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software

About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2021 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA