finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedAdvertiseForum
(current
topics)
topic 5504

Alternate Coatings for QQ-N-290




(2000)

Good afternoon,

The Navy is currently seeking alternative coatings to replace the current electrodeposited nickel plating (per SAE-AMS-QQ-N-290 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] , Class 1-corrosion protection, Grade E-0.0006 inch thick) on a spring clip component. The nickel plating is not uniform over the entire component. The spring clip is made of AISI 1075 steel, and has a thickness of 0.0150 +/- 0.0005 inch before plating. A fuze plug is inserted into an opening on this spring clip, leading to the eventual detonation of a warhead. The following properties of the spring clip must not be compromised, with the application of the proposed coating:

1. The proposed coating shall provide equal or greater corrosion resistance to the electrodeposited nickel (the current ADL requires a 24-hour salt fog test),

2. The electrical properties of the proposed coating should be similar to that of the nickel coating (the proposed coating shall exhibit a resistivity of approximately 10 - 20m Ohms, maximum) ,

3. The insertion value of the fuze plug should remain consistent with that provided by the nickel, i.e. the coating should not be too thick to hinder the insertion of the plug (the QQ-N-290 nickel at 0.0006-inch thickness was required to provide an insertion force of 5 - 35 pounds.)

4. The coating should be compatible with the soldering requirements (Type SN63 solder, at approximately 375 °F),

5. The coating should be compatible with the potting compound that it is to be encased within (Stycast 2651-40 & Catalyst 11 per MIL-I-16923).

If possible, please propose up to five alternate coatings (aside from electroless nickel which is already being assessed) which may be used in this situation, under these circumstances.

Marc S. Pepi
US


(2000)

EN is probably the best from the control standpoint, number of job shops available, and price that meet your criteria. Vapor deposited nickel is certainly worth looking into also.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


(2000)

We are currently providing Ni vapor deposition services for various types of small parts. These parts are solderable and will meet the corrosion criteria.

Mandar Sunthankar
- Fort Collins, Colorado



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.