finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
no_pop_no_spam
HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedsForum letter 52350
Serious Education ... plus the most fun you can have in metal finishing.

Hardcoat Anodizing Voltage


June 9, 2009

Q. I know that for Hardcoat anodizing one needs a current density 36 ASF. As a job shop, how does one avoid burning parts having operators not calculating the surface area? Is it possible to run Hardcoat based on voltage as in conventional sulfuric anodizing?

Travis Moore
Plating Shop Employee - Houston, Texas, USA


June 12, 2009

A. Hi Travis

One of the best ways to avoid burning is by using pulse anodizing. I have written a couple of papers and a book about this.

One of the rectifier companies sells a controller which doesn't need to have a calculation of surface area from the operators.

Running Hard anodizing by Voltage is as bad an idea as it is for conventional anodizing. You use too much energy and the process time is often prolonged so a soft coating is found on the surface instead of a hard.

Sunny regards
Anne


Anne Deacon Juhl
- San Diego, California, USA


June 12, 2009

A. 36 Amps per square foot is fine for production and lab development jobs of all same size where you can tune the free acid, temp, current density for high current; but, a job shop with varying sizes and alloys needs to stick to 24 ASF to stay out of trouble.

There are three ways to get 24 ASF on the load. (1) Measure the surface area, (2) Use the "parallel circuit method" published by Dr Harold Weisner in the 1958 AES Proceedings and plagiarized by me in Aluminum How-To, (3) Using 16 volts for all alloys except 21 volts for 2000 alloys, spend 7 minutes slowly ramping up to 16 volts, now look at the ammeter, note the total amps at 16 volts, spend the next 6 minutes slowly ramping up to EXACTLY TWO TIMES THAT NOTED AMPERAGE, set the automatic current control, walk away; while you are gone the voltage will automatically increase to hold that current steady at 24 ASF.

Robert H Probert
Robert H Probert Technical Services

Garner, North Carolina

Editor's note: Mr. Probert is the author of Aluminum How-To / Aluminio El Como



June 17, 2009

A. Travis

As mentioned, running by volts is not the best way to anodize.

If your operating parameters are sound...

Manually ramp (3-5 minute duration) to 24 volts and hold for 5 minutes. After 5 minutes, increase voltage 2 volts every 5 minutes and continue. Check your thickness when you see fit. Current density will start out < 36 ASF, increase to > 36 ASF, and drop off substantially towards the end of a 2-mil thick run on 6xxx. You can play with the later intervals.

Also consider that burning is typically caused by localized overheating. Do you have enough agitation?

Willie Alexander
- Colorado Springs, Colorado


June 18, 2009

Q. Thank you for your quick responses. Mr. Probert, I recently purchased a copy of your book and am interested in trying the parallel circuit method. After reading your book I was impressed with its easy to understand methodology. I am curious though; as a job shop, our racking material is almost exclusively 6061 Aluminum. If I were to hardcoat a part that was 2024, the current would be preferential to the rack. Is there any way to mitigate this without buying 2024 racks?

Travis Moore [returning]
- Houston, Texas, USA


June 19, 2009

A. Mask the 6061 with platers tape or paint-on maskant. Try heavy anodizing of the 6061, perfect seal, trim off the bare contact marks, rack after clean and deox then quick dip back in the deox. Small parts CAN be hard coated on titanium. The two leading rack manufacturers in the USA do not agree with me on titanium, but there is a limit as to how much it will carry and how wide the contact area must be to get twice the amps.


Robert H Probert
Robert H Probert Technical Services
Garner, North Carolina


June 19, 2009

A. Hi Travis

You could mask the 6061 racks, or try a titanium rack. I know a lot of people don't like to use titanium racks because it doesn't conduct the current as well as the aluminum.

Titanium racks are useful in a hard anodizing process when 2024 alloys are processed. You just need to be very sure that the contact from rack to part is good.

Sunny regards
Anne


Anne Deacon Juhl
- San Diego, California, USA


June 24, 2009

thumbs up signThank you guys for your helpful responses. I am going to try to find some plastisol and mask off that way on our existing 6061 racks.

Travis Moore [returning]
- Houston, Texas, USA



March 1, 2012 -- this entry appended to this thread by editor in lieu of spawning a duplicative thread

Q. I have been doing hard anodize for quite some time and realize some of the problems especially with 2000 series.
I have been talking to a company who claims to have a hard coat controller that you can enter in your desired thickness and the controller will do the rest. I consider this very unlikely knowing some of the factors we face after running the process. I would like some other opinion about the feasibility of this.

Dennis Solt CEF
Hard Anodize - Warner Robins, Georgia


June 15, 2012

Q. I want to know the process of hard anodizing in H2SO4 bath.
I have made a bath with 1.15 density. We are processing each batch with 200 pieces each; the area of one piece is 17500 sq mm per piece. Our cycle time is 65 minutes with 400 amp. We are starting at 50 amps and increase 50 amps every 5 minutes to maximum 400 amps, with bath temperature +2 to -2 Celsius. Is it correct ? Or what should be real process?

Nilesh Narodia
- India


June 15, 2012

A. Hi Nilesh.

So the area per load is 3.5 sq. meters (37.7 sq. feet)? If so, the amperage seems low.

I'm not personally familiar with your idea of starting out at very low amperage. Low voltage to prevent burning, yes. But a very long, very slow ramp-up of current seems non-beneficial and a waste of potential productivity. Perhaps those with more hard anodizing experience will correct me.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey


June 22, 2012

A. Ted is correct, the amperage is way too low. You should be more in the 950-1000 amp range, at minimum (assuming Ted's math is correct). You'll want to ramp to that final current setting amps in about 5 minutes total. That should put your process time at a little over an hour to produce a 50 µm coating (typical hardcoat thickness). You say your cycle time is 65 minutes, at the current settings you mentioned, that should produce approx. a 25 µm coating.

Your temperature is fine. You'll want to keep your dissolved Al content at around 8 gr/lt max.

Those are just the basics.


Marc Green
anodizer - Boise, Idaho



October 2, 2014

Q. Hope you can shed some light on increasing the primary barrier anodizing layer thickness for increased corrosion resistance to a 5% HCl acid testing in a Type III Sulfuric bath.
We are also trying to increase our dielectric breakdown voltage with increasing the primary anodizing layer.

We have a 15% H2SO4 bath system with cooling at 28-32 °F.
Our materials are Aluminum 6061-T6 forgings with some bar stock.

We are trying an initial ramp of 13 ASF at 13 V for 18 minutes.
The 2nd anodizing pore layer is run at 30-35 ASF with a 12 min ramp and then held at constant current for a total of 63 amps until 60 volts is reached .
Should we alter this approach and include pulse plating or modify the initial ramp rate and current density of 13 ASF?

daniel schick
- redwood city, California USA


October 2014

A. Hi Daniel. Pending getting a response to your situation specifically, you can read Anne, Robert, and Willie's suggestions on the subject earlier in this thread, and also see letter 13351, "Suggested ASF for hardcoat anodizing". Good luck.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey



May 8, 2017 -- this entry appended to this thread by editor in lieu of spawning a duplicative thread

Q. I need to know the percentage of sulphuric acid in water for hard anodizing. I created my own tank to run a few tests but the solution starts eating aluminium within 5 minutes of starting the process.

The tank I used was of 12 x 3 x 3 feet and starting voltage was 15 volt. I ran 3 tests with aluminium but every time the aluminium part starts to get damaged within 5 minutes.
Can you please suggest what is wrong with my process?

Pradeep Papnai
- India


May 2017

A. Hi Pradeep. We appended your inquiry to a thread that may help because I doubt that the concentration was the principal issue; I think you probably "burned" the aluminum with too much current. Although the hard anodized coating is of very high electrical resistance, bare aluminum has almost none. So you need a high voltage near the end of the cycle to keep the current flowing despite the high resistance; but at the beginning of the cycle you need a very low voltage; read the earlier responses for specific instructions. Also, are you sure you have very good local agitation to keep the temperature down to about 32 °F (0 °C)?

You didn't say what your solution was, or why you picked that concentration. That makes it difficult for anyone to guess whether the concentration you picked contributed to the problem in some way; and people can't recommend that you experiment with concentration in an 800 gallon tank ... what would you do with 400 gallons of sulphuric acid solution if they told you yours was twice as strong as it should be? And if someone does answer your question, you'll either say "But that's exactly what I used!", or you'll repeat the experiment with their recommended concentration and probably suffer the same result anyway :-)

So please tell us what you used, not just that you tried 'something' and it didn't work :-)

Luck and Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView This Week's HOT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It is not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.