Authoritative Answers, Fun, & Aloha -- no cost, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
Site 🔍
pub     mobile?
Metal finishing Q&As since 1989


Thickness of anodize coatings

none is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q. Hi,

I am starting an anodizing line and reading through the spec I have to get to 1000mg/ft2, but the spec doesn't tell me how to get that calculation. Also should I anodize the 3" x 3" test panels for Class 1 or Class 2 in order to hit the min required to follow MIL-A-8625? Any help would be greatly appreciated!!


David Franklin
Manager - Madison, Wisconsin
March 29, 2022

A. Generally, Type II anodizing to MIL-A-8625 gets .5-.7 of oxide. Type III 1.6 to 2.4 oxide. Are you working to Mil spec or a customer spec?

drew nosti
Drew Nosti, CEF
Anodize USA
supporting advertiser
Ladson, South Carolina
March 31, 2022

Q. Thanks for responding Drew, I appreciate it. I am trying to follow MIL-A-8625. I am using 3x3 panels so I am assuming to get my calculation of my coating weight I would need to take the difference of the two measurements (after anodizing and then the stripped weights) multiply it by 144 and then divide it by 18 to get my mg/ft2. But I wanted to confirm that with someone that has been in the industry longer than I have been.

David Franklin [returning]
- Madison, Wisconsin
April 3, 2022

A. You can take the NADCAP auditor out of NADCAP but you cant take the NADCAP out of the auditor.
Here you go:
6.1 Measure the area of the coating. Do not include the area of cut edges or other uncoated surfaces
6.2 Weigh the test specimen before and after stripping the coating to the nearest 1mg
6.3 Immerse the specimen for 5 min in the phosphoric-chromic acid solution@ about 100C. Remove the specimen, wash in distilled or deionized water, dry, and weigh the specimen. Repeat this cycle until the coating is completely removed which is indicated by the weight of the specimen remaining constant.
Make sure you follow this "repeat part" or your results will be worthless

drew nosti
Drew Nosti, CEF
Anodize USA
supporting advertiser
Ladson, South Carolina
April 4, 2022

⇩ Related postings, oldest first ⇩

Q. We have a requirement to anodize parts that are pins per MIL-A-8625 / MIL-PRF-8625 [on DLA] Type II Class I. The required pin diameter prior to anodize is .2459"/.2465". The required diameter after anodize and sealing is .2479"/.2485". Is this even possible to achieve? This is not a Hard Anodize process. Our specification also says "Anodic coatings, after sealing, shall weigh a minimum of 600 milligrams per square foot". How thick is this? Is this MIL spec, pin diameter prior to anodize, and coating thickness all consistent?

Bob Lunnon
MFG. ENGR. - Gainesville, Texas
January 8, 2009

simultaneous replies

A. The difference is 0.0006 on the diameter, or 0.0003 on the side, which is very low for Type II and more like the newer IIB. If you will contact me I will read some of the ratios between coating weight and thickness from Sheasby/Pinner, which depends on alloy, time, current density, temperature, and acid concentration. The coating weight you call out does seem low for the thickness. 2024 at 0.00027 thickness and 0.00018 dimensional change shows 1104 mg, 6061 at 0.00028 which is 0.00019 dimensional change, shows 1758 mg, and 7075 at 0.00029 which is 0.00019 dimensional change shows 1594 mg. The difference between the thickness and the dimensional change is because the anodic film is approx. 1/2 under the original surface and approx. 1/2 above the original surface., again, depending on the parameters listed above.

robert probert
Robert H Probert
Robert H Probert Technical Services
supporting advertiser
Garner, North Carolina
January 9, 2009

A. Bob

Refer to Table IV in section 6.10.5 of MIL-A-8625 for typical thickness ranges. Asking for a .0020" thickness from a Type II coating is asking a bit much unless you have developed a special process.

Table 1 in section lists the minimum coating weight (unsealed) for Type II coatings to be 1000 mg/ft2. Sealing will increase the coating weight. We see 1800 - 2000 mg/ft2 on 2024 T3 @ .0006" thickness (Type II). A .0020" coating will have a significantly higher weight even if the coating is exceptionally porous.

The coating weight, per unit of measure thickness, will vary depending upon operating conditions. Usually, coating weight or thickness is specified for a part. Occasionally, both will need to be controlled.

Is this a well designed part? Depends. Most 2-mil coatings are for wear resistance, corrosion resistance, or electrical resistance. Allowing such a low coating weight for this coating allows inferior coatings to be presented as acceptable. Determine what the coating is supposed to do, and revise the requirement accordingly. Why pay for a 2-mil thick coating if half that will suffice.

Willie Alexander
- Colorado Springs, Colorado
January 10, 2009

A. That's only a .002" coating, and while that's a bit thick for a type 2 coating, it certainly is achievable. I really can't comment intelligently about the weight of a type 2 coating at that thickness.

Marc Green
Marc Green
anodizer - Boise, Idaho
January 12, 2009

A. Bob: Type II anodize (Sulfuric) requires a coating thickness of .0003-.0007 inches. Because the coating converts the aluminum surface to aluminum oxide, the coating penetrates the surface as well as expands, therefore the net change in a diameter is usually the same as the coating thickness. Take your finish dimensions and adjust accordingly.

Kent Backus
Fort Worth, Texas, USA
January 12, 2009

Hard Coat Anodizing Coat Weight Measurement

"The Metallurgy of Anodizing Aluminum"
by Runge & Kaufman

on AbeBooks

or eBay or


(affil links)

Q. We have a plating line in house and since I'm still relatively new to the process, I am reviewing the MIL-A-8625 to clean up our paperwork. The spec for Type III is minimum coating weight of 4320 mg/ft^2 for every 0.001". According to a lab, the coating weight is measured from the before and after stripping of the panels. They take the thickness measurement with an eddy current tester for 1 side.The resulting number is to divide the coating weight by the one-sided measurement. Is this correct? I would think per the MIL-A-8625 that the coating weight, that was stripped from both sides, be divided by the total thickness? How is this MIL-A-8625 spec for type 3 interpreted?

Trung Lively
- Black Mountain, North Carolina USA
October 14, 2019

A. Hi Trung,

Coating weight for Type III coatings is optional upon request from the procuring authority. So, if you can measure the thickness by eddy current, you don't need to do coating weight. Unless your customer requires the test to be done, I wouldn't bother, personally.

Brian Terry
Aerospace - Yeovil, Somerset, UK
October 15, 2019

(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Chemicals &
& Software

About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"