No passwords, no registration, no paywalls, no popups, no AI

As an Amazon Associate & eBay Partner we earn from affil links

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
SITE
NEWS
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry Search our quarter-million Q&As

Home of the finishing HOTLINE since 1989

-----

How to compute the removed metal by electropolishing given the current and time



I am researching on electropolishing process and want to find out how to compute the removed metal given the applied current and dipping time. Can you provide the formula?

Jury Casas
employee - Cebu, Philippines
2007



Hi, Jury. What books do you have available for your research? Maybe we can point you to appropriate chapters. But start with Faraday's Law of Electrolysis -- it is most of the answer.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha

finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey

Need quick confidential answers? $25
Need project assistance? $100/hr.
2007



Jury
How accurately do you want the answer? Faradays law is a good first guess but there could be purely chemical reactions, giving a higher rate of dissolution and/or other electrolytic reactions slowing the process.
Why not... Take a piece of metal, electropolish it, note the current and time and re-weigh it.
If you want to really understand the process repeat with new and old solutions, higher and lower currents / temperatures, etc.

geoff smith
Geoff Smith
Hampshire, England
2007



Geoff has the right idea. Electropolishing is not a very efficient process, so although Faraday's laws do apply (as they do to virtually all electrochemical reactions), the laws themselves will not give you an accurate answer with regard to metal loss. The problem is that not only is metal dissolved during electropolishing, but oxygen is discharged, so you need to take into account both processes. The best thing is to follow Geoff's advice and do a range of experiments under known conditions and find how the metal dissolution efficiencies vary with changes in experimental conditions

trevor crichton
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist
Chesham, Bucks, UK
2007


Sorry! Finishing.com is temporarily Read-Only.
Ted Mooney is retiring but I have several offers to take it over.
We're working hard to make sure we find it the best new home.





Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2026 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"