Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub
Metal finishing Q&As since 1989


-----

Conversion of surface finish




We use a lot of polished stainless steel for one of our product lines. Every now and then we will receive an order which specifies a finish in RMS. Our stainless suppliers use terminology such as a 2B finish. Can you tell me where I can find a conversion table, or how to calculate, to convert RMS to Ra to No. 2B finishes to others?

Thanks for your help.

Darrell Dillard
- Athens, TEXAS
2002



Profilometer: Mahr Pocket-Surf
profilometer3
on eBay or

Amazon

(affil links)

The question of RMS to Ra and the reverse has been answered a couple of times within this category [letters 9524, and 20490, and many others]. Mill grades is another question that is a wild card. If you are really concerned with the QC or proper surface finish, I suggest you look into purchasing a profilometer to test the surface profile yourself. A starting point or rough guideline is that normal mill steel is about 35 RMS or roughly 120+ Ra, then most abrasive products will smooth out the surface in a ratio that slows down as you get finer.

tony kenton
AF Kenton
retired business owner - Hatboro, Pennsylvania
2002


The best explanation I found on the web on roughness notations and meanings is www.predev.com/smg/specification.htm. However, I could not find there your 2B; the closest is N2, which corresponds to Ra=2 micro-in; pay attention that Rq (or RMS) is a different way of calculating roughness, therefore Rq does not correlate directly to Ra.

Giovanni M. Ciriani
promotions - Altavilla, VI, Italy
2002



Hi, Darrell. 2B is not a surface finish specification; rather it is a process or procedure to do to stainless steel. But letter 22222 tells you what surface finish this procedure will usually produce.

Do not try to convert between RMS and Ra because they measure different things; to promise a particular RMS requires a wastefully high Ra and vice versa.

Regards, 

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
April 29, 2009




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"