-- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
Serious Education & the most FUN
you can have in metal finishing smiley

No popups, spam, registration or passwords
on this site
current topics
topic 1744

Salt spray test for austenitic stainless steel.

adv.   auto technology banner

A discussion started in 1998 but continuing through 2018


Q. Anyone know how long 303 stainless steel (free-machining, with sulfur) is supposed to hold up in standard neutral salt spray?

This is assuming it will pass the test at all, and that the material has been properly passivated (nitric/dichromate or citric acid per ASTM).

Thanks in advance. A quick response will be greatly appreciated.

bill vins
Bill Vins
microwave & cable assemblies
Mesa (what a place-a), Arizona 


A. QQ-P-35C [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency,] says that the parts (they mention 303 containing sulfur) should pass 2 hours salt spray. They say to use Type II passivating solution.

pooky tom pullizi signature
Tom Pullizzi
Falls Township, Pennsylvania


Austenitic Stainless Steel

Q. Anyone know how long the austenite stainless steel (grade SUS 304, 305, 316 and 316L) can withstand the salt spray mist testing before the first red rust spot appear.

The information is urgently needed.

Thank in advance. The prompt reply is much appreciated.

Ng Guat Peng
steel company - Malacca, Malaysia.


A. I have salt fog tested 304, 304L and 316 for 2500 hours and did not see red rust.

I do not have a report on this since I am not employed by that firm any longer.

The test was per ASTM ASTM B117 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] , surface was scribed. the test was to assure the paint adhered to the stainless after 2000 hours, not to find red rust. In the same test 409 stainless was tested.

I have routinely tested 304L and 409 stainless at 1500 hours per ANSI C57.12.28, Draft 5.

Hope this helped you.


Tyrone L. Caley
- Jefferson City, Missouri


Q. Please give the details for the following subject

1. Method of salt spray test - corrosion resistance - life period - for all coatings like Zinc, hardchrome, anodising and painting on base materials iron, aluminium alloys, aluminium and brass materials.

- Coimbatore - Tamilnadu-India


A. Hi Palkannan,

You could start getting the answers to those questions with the purchase of the following seven AESF illustrated lectures: Corrosion, Testing, Metallurgy, Zinc Plating, Chromium Plating, Anodizing, and Phosphate Conversion Coatings. Good luck -- but it's a broad question so there are no really quick answers. You might want to sign up for an AESF intensive training course, or a course by Kushner Electroplating School. Good luck.

Ted Mooney, Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Pine Beach, New Jersey


Q. We have fabricated a stainless steel (SS 304) tank for oil (2%) emulsion in water for Roll Coolant System in Cold (steel) Rolling Mill. On filling of the oil-water emulsion, rust formation has been reported by the User. Is rust formation possible in SS 304 stainless steel, especially where the sheets have been welded?

Shall appreciate receiving any view & how this can be countered.

Sandip Sen
Bangalore, Karnataka, India

June 22, 2011

A. If you have used SS 304 for a coolant tank then there should be no rusting and if you find some red rust like formation most likely they are some acid cleaning in that area which might have caused this, you can simply use a buffing wheel and your problem should be solved.
We had a similar problem and with just buffing we were able to get back our SS304 back in action, all the best.

Dhiren Sankhla
End User - Bangalore, India

Salt spray test for 409, 304, and 201 stainless steels

August 4, 2018

Q. Dear All
I want to know difference between SUS409 and 304 and 201 stainless steel in salt spray testing.

Hadi A

August 2018

A. Hi Hadi. Can you tell us what you're involved in here, rather than casting the question in the abstract?

Because it's probably not an appropriate test for all of those materials, especially SUS409. It may indicate the degree of passivation more than variations in composition, and it certainly can't be used as a test method to determine one material from the other. I don't want to try to predict what I think would be the unpredictable results you should expect from a test that maybe you probably shouldn't be doing anyway, at least not without carefully specifying it :-)

Good luck but please tell us the situation before asking for expected test results.

Thanks & Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"

September 20, 2018

Q. Is there a general expectation for number of salt spray hours different stainless steels will last before rusting? I have a print that calls for 1000 hours per ASTM and to use 316 stainless on a screw. Is 316 naturally going to last 1000 hours before rusting or does it need to be passivated a special way or treated to meet 1000?

Nick Ford
fasteners - cleveland Ohio United states

September 2018

A. Hi Nick. All stainless steel should be passivated. It's not an optional topcoating; rather it's a process of dissolving and removing any remnants of carbon steel from the surface. Without it, rust from those remnants of the manufacturing process must be expected.

I think it may be possible for 316 stainless steel to "last 1000 hours before rusting" because a number of knowledgeable people on this site have made that claim ... but can you quote a spec? ASTM B117 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] would be instruction for how to build & operate a salt spray chamber, but not for how to evaluate the results of the test. The processing specs often tell you how to interpret failures, and without a spec you're quickly into no man's land (for example, do you use naked eye, a jeweler's loupe, or a microscope to look for the rust?)


pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"

September 20, 2018

thumbs up sign  Thanks Ted, appreciate the quick reply. Our requirements are usually spelled out clearly but not on a current project so I'd thought I'd seek out your expertise. "All should be passivated" is helpful.

Nick Ford [returning]
- cleveland Ohio United states

September 28, 2018

Q. I need test results of SS Type 304 of ASTM A240 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] and the time duration it withstands the salt water because we are trying to replace galvanized steel with the above-mentioned material.

Balachandar Mohan
- Chennai, TamilNadu, India

September 2018

A. Hi Balachandar. Sorry, but the question is a bit backwards. Regardless of salt spray hours for stainless vs. galvanized, it will not give you even a faint clue about which is better for the application. Salt spray hours cannot be used to compare the corrosion resistance of different materials :-(

Properly passivated type 304 stainless steel should be excellent in a non-salty, non-chlorine environment as long as it is not in metallic contact with any other metal. If it actually is in contact with or splashed with salt water, 304 SS is unlikely to be acceptable, you'll probably need 316 SS. Please explain your application. Thanks. Good luck.


pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"

If you have a question in mind which seems off topic, please Search the Site

ADD a Comment to THIS thread START a NEW threadView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices

©1995-2018, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.