finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
current topics

60,000 Q&A topics -- Education, Aloha, & Fun

topic 15586

Determination of boric acid in nickel plating baths


A discussion started in 1998 and continuing through 2020
Adding your Q. / A. or Comment will restore it to the Current Topics page

1998

Q. Hi .... I'm trying to better understand/improve the boric acid determinations we perform on our baths. Currently we follow a procedure very similar to that specified in the Metal Finishing Guidebook. In essence: add mannitol to convert the boric to a titratable form and use bromocresol purple to indicate the endpoint. The problem I have is that the endpoint isn't as clear as I would like it to be. So I've looked in a few texts discussing plating bath analysis, "The Chemical Analysis of Electroplating Solutions" [affil. link to book info on Amazon], Irvine, 1970 and "Analysis of Electroplating and Related Solutions" [paid link to info about book on AbeBooks] and I've found that both references call for phenolphthalein as the indicator. They also call for the addition of sodium citrate to prevent formation of Ni(OH)2. Does anyone have experience with these two indicators and which would work better? I didn't try it because I don't currently have any sodium citrate. The bromocresol purple method doesn't call for sodium citrate I presume because the bromocresol purple changes color before Ni(OH)2 precipitation becomes a problem. If I've done my calculations correctly, Ni(OH)2 would start forming around pH 7.6 for a nickel bath with Ni conc at 10 oz/gal. At this pH bromocresol purple has already been converted from its acid form to its base form and phenolphthalein hasn't even begun to change.

Also if anyone is aware of other plating analysis texts I'd be interested in the references.

Thanks much.

JDK

JD Kronicz



1998

A. The endpoint is a very good one.
The manitol is added to a thin paste, just a little thinner than Elmers, because the dilute NaOH is going to add quite a bit of liquid.
Double the amount of BCP indicator that you are using. If that does not help, make up a new solution.
I normally used a glass stirring rod in a 25 ml beaker. A friend of mine used a slightly thinner solution and used a flea and a magnetic stirrer for the actual titration.
It is an excellent and very reproducable analytical procedure within plus or minus 0.1 ml of titrant.

Once you see it done , you will agree that it is a very good procedure.

PS: the amount of boric acid in your nickel solution is very dependent on temperature of the sample. Hot solution holds a lot more than a room temp one. Normal concentrations will salt out at room temp and give you a low and very erratic reading.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


1998

A. Mr. Watts's P.S. is an excellent lead-in into a less orthodox way of determining where you stand with boric acid concentration. Since the actual concentration of boric acid in the solution is not as important as that it is above a certain limit (usually above its solubility at room temperature), consider this "test" I have been using for years:

Fill a small (1 cc) test tube with your solution and let it cool down to room temperature. The amount of boric acid crystals formed is a pretty good indication of whether you need to make an add.

Once you use this method for a while, you will agree that it is the only procedure you need for boric acid analysis :-)

Good luck from PlaterB

berl stein berl sig
"PlaterB" Berl Stein
NiCoForm, Inc.
supporting advertiser
Rochester, New York
nicoform


1998

Sounds good, but does not work until some homework is done. It takes quite a bit of volume to cover the pH probe. The normal way is to use a thin paste, which does not give much quantity. It would be more of a pain than it is worth. The indicator method works very well, is quick, easy and generates a lot less waste.

I am not sure that a large dilution will give the same answer.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


1998

A. Potentiometric titration with pH electrode provides very accurate determination of end point. Most probably, you already have necessary equipment: pH-meter and glass electrode.

Gene Chalyt
- E. Rutherford, New Jersey


1999

A. I USED TO USE BROMOCRESOL PURPLE,UNTIL I FOUND A BETTER WAY. MY PROCEDURE TO CHECK BORIC CONTENT IN NICKEL BATHS IS 5 ML SAMPLE IN ERLENMEYER FLASK,ADD 5 DROPS OF BORIC ACID INDICATOR, SWIRL WHILE TITRATING WITH 1.N NaOH TILL BLUE RECORD THIS AS A. NEXT ADD A HEAPING TEASPOON OF MANITOL.(THIS WILL TURN BACK TO GREEN) SWIRL WHILE CONTINUING TITRATING WITH 1.N NaOH TILL SLURRY TURNS BLUE AGAIN.RECORD THIS NUMBER AS B. CALCULATION IS B-A X 1.65 GIVES YOU OZ/GAL BORIC.DO NOT REZERO BURET AFTER FIRST TITRATION. THIS HAS SEEMED TO BE VERY ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT FOR ME.

JOHN ROLLINS
-FRIDLEY Minnesota

----
Ed. note: Readers -- This is a large site with 60,000 finishing topics. If you are working with sulfamate nickel rather than a Watts bath, be sure to search the site for "sulfamate boric" or similar terms [maybe also insert 'Probert' in your search phrase because Robert is a sulfamate nickel specialist] for several threads about that because the situation is rather different.



To minimize search efforts and to offer multiple viewpoints, we combined previously separate threads onto this page. Please forgive any resultant repetition, failures of chronological order, or what may look like readers disrespecting previous responses -- those other responses may not have been on the page at the time :-)



2000

Q. Currently I have some problems with autotitration of boric acid in nickel plating bath, autotitrator is MT 70ES. I add mannitol into sample and use NaOH as titrant, with pH electrode to measure endpoint. In last three months, I found signal at endpoint became lower and lower, dropped from about 2000 mv/ml to 100 mv/ml, meanwhile endpoint became noise and results were not so repeatable. After evaluation, I did not find any problem with autotitrator and chemicals, for new prepared nickel bath, signal at endpoint is still about 2000 mv/ml.

Q1: why does signal drop so much with extension of nickel bath life?

Q2: Is there any way to recover endpoint signal to high level, e.g., 1000 mv/ml?

Wang Li Ping
- Singapore


2000

A. My guess is that you have drag in and or breakdown products that are forming a buffer that interferes with your titration.

I used color indicators, but the result is pH sensitive so are somewhat equal. I never saw the phenomenon you speak of.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida



To minimize search efforts and to offer multiple viewpoints, we combined previously separate threads onto this page. Please forgive any resultant repetition, failures of chronological order, or what may look like readers disrespecting previous responses -- those other responses may not have been on the page at the time :-)



2002

Q. The problem being encountered with the boric acid titration is that we are not getting enough accuracy. Precision is good, but for a 30 g/L QC sample a typical value obtained would be around 34 g/L. Can anyone explain this inaccuracy? We don't use any indicators at present, when titrating the QC 0.5 mL are pipetted into a titration vessel, along with 20 mL DI water and 20 mL of a 50 g/ 500 mL mannitol solution. Endpoint is determined using a pH electrode. Thoughts on this appreciated because the current method of ion chromatography is running into problems and we are not confident that the results generated are reliable. We hope to introduce the titration method in the near future.

Kevin Colm Behan
- Leixlip, Co. Kildare, Ireland


2002

A. Firstly, what are your problems with ion chromatography? In the past I have used it with great success, but you do need to use very dilute solutions. However, boric acid has a tendency to remain in the system as it is not easily fully flushed through. I also believe a similar thing happens with boron analysis by ICP.

My first thought is that the tank volume is varying; - make sure you keep the water level topped up otherwise you will be sampling a "too concentrated" bath! You do not give much information about the electrolyte; is there any chance of something interfering with the titration. Alternatively, since boric acid is a pretty weak trivalent acid, perhaps you are not giving the pH "end point" sufficient time to be reached and are hence overshooting. I have to admit I have not used the mannitol method, so I cannot speak about it from experience.

I generally analyze boric acid in nickel baths by taking 1ml of the bath and adding it to 25 mls of "boric acid mix". The text books say use 2 mls, but I have found this problematic. I even sometimes add another 9 mls of water to further dilute to green colour. I then titrate the aliquot against 0.1N NaOH, ensuring the liquid is thoroughly shaken throughout. The concentration of boric acid in the bath is then: [H3BO3]g/l = mls NaOH x 6.184

Obviously the sodium hydroxide needs standardizing and should not be stored too long, otherwise it absorbs CO2 and changes its concentration.

Boric acid mix is 600 mls of glyercol with 60g sodium citrate and 2g phenolphthalein, that has been dissolved in a minimal amount of hot ethanol, and the whole lot diluted to 1 litre. This solution is quite viscous and should be thoroughly shaken before use. It is also essential to thoroughly shake the titrating mixture because even that is viscous.

I know there are other methods for analyzing boric acid, but this seems to be the best I have found. The only problem is the end point; the liquid is green and the end point is when the solution goes violet/pink. However, it does not do this until after it has been through a blue colour and the transition from blue to violet/pink can be difficult to see. Hence, I use only 1 ml of the plating bath, as this helps me see the final end point; diluting it further with 9 mls of water makes it even easier to see.

trevor crichton
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist
Chesham, Bucks, UK


2002

A. I always did this analysis by the old time method; blending about 10 grams of mannitol with 5 - 10 mls of sample and just enough water to form a mobile slurry, titrating with 1.0 N NaOH to a bromcreosol purple endpoint, and multiplying the mls titrated by 0.824 (for a 10 ml sample) to get the boric acid number. I believe that if you took your boric standard, added the known required volume of NaOH to neutralize the boric under the conditions described above, and used this mixture as a guide to endpoint recognition in titrating your bath, that this would give you the needed accuracy and precision.

There is another method where the pH is adjusted to a fixed value, and the mls of standard alkali required to raise the pH by exactly 0.50 pH units recorded and used to calculate the answer. I have never used it, and don't have the procedure handy, but some vendors recommend it and I don't doubt you could locate it with a bit of searching.

Hope this has been of some help.

dave wichern
Dave Wichern
Consultant - The Bronx, New York


2002

A. Kevin,

I analyze the boric acid in nickel bath by taking 2 ml of solution then add 5 ml distilled water, add 4 drops of bromothymol blue and bromocresol purple mixed indicator, add 5 grams mannitol powder and mix. Titrate 0.1N SODIUM HYDROXIDE TO THE BLUE END POINT.

Calculation : ml of 0.1N NaoH Used x 0.41 = oz/gal Boric acid ( 1 OZ/GAL = 7.5 Grams/liter )

popat patel
Popat Patel
finishing shop - Roseville, Michigan


2003

A. I agree with Dave W. In fact I may have guided him in that direction from my early '80s work. This does make the color appearance more observable and accuracy and precision improve. Kevin is using a pH electrode for detection. It may be possible that while traversing the buffing region there may be a delay in response due to several factors. The boric may still be slightly polymerized, because it is only slowly hydrated, if indeed completely. Hydrogen (hydronium) ions also need to become hydrated and pass through the glass frit of electrode. It may also be possible that the boric associates with the (silicate) glass or even dissolve into the initial surface to cause a sluggish effect on proton mobility through the glass as would be expected in borosilicates. There may also be other fundamental principles to consider. pH titrations are logarithmic. They depend on the detection of potential gradients generated by changing hydroxyl and hydronium ion concentrations.

According to J. Jordon, J. Chem. Educ. V40 A5 1963, the weak acid, boric does not have a crisp endpoint as does hydrochloric acid. Boric needs an indicator which has a color change at c 10.3. Boric doesn't need mannitol added and in fact its addition makes the analysis less accurate. However, by detecting the heat (changes of 0.001 °C) generated from reacting with caustic, e.g. 0.5 N NaOH, both hydrochloric and boric titrations are on an even playing field. Like hydrochloric, boric has then become detectable down to 0.002%. Introducing nickel mucks this up. Boric acid plus nickel, as in plating baths, appears to require mannitol addition. The reason may be that borate chelates or ligates nickel (remember the polymeric forms of boric). Results by detecting heats of reaction from caustic titration with and without mannitol show that a very low value for boric and very high value for nickel occurs without adding mannitol. Perhaps the heat delay is reserved for removing the borate sequestration of nickel ions during the normal hydroxo- formation. Adding mannitol has the effect of enhancing the weak proton (hydronium, or hydrogen ion) as needed, in the presence of nickel, by the displacement of water when mannitol reacts with borate to give the chelated structure of boron. It consists of two 5-membered rings formed doubly from two adjacent carbons' hydroxyl oxygens with the single boron ion and bears a single negative charge, easily correlated to boric acid concentration.

The heat of reaction between the mannitol and boric singly pales in comparison with the changed heat from no addition of mannitol with nickel present. Thus a single (linear) titration with only caustic, using mannitol, will accurately detect both boric acid and nickel. From an example, results in g/L are expressed as Average (Standard Deviation) for Boric, 36.7 (0.61) and Nickel, 77.52 (0.24) for five titrations using 1.95 N NaOH of 2.65 gm. plating solution (to 10 ml. water) and 10 ml. of 25% mannitol.

Stephen Koelzer
- Sunnyvale, California, USA



March 18, 2014

Q. Hi Trevor,
Could you please let me know if the Boric acid mix is further diluted to 1 L with Ethanol, or with Deionized water?
Thank you

Julia Gilliland
- Danbury Connecticut USA


April 8, 2014

Q. I am experimenting with your method (Trevor) for the determination of Boric Acid but am having problems with the Boric Acid Mix.
1- I can't get the sodium citrate to dissolve even in hot ethanol,
2- It dissolves in water but not fully.
Can you tell me how do you get it to dissolve, and how do you fill it to 1000 ml? In Glycerol?

Julia Gilliland [returning]
- Danbury Connecticut USA


April 9, 2014

A. Hi Julia,

You may try below alternative method:

Reagents:
1. Manitol Solution (Dissolve 100 g Manitol in D.I. water and make up to 1 litre)
2. B.C.P. (Bromo Cresol Purple) Indicator
3. 0.1 N Sodium Hydroxide Solution

Procedure:
1. Pipette 1.0 ml sample into a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask.
2. Add 40 ml of Manitol solution into the flask.
3. Add 2 drops B.C.P. indicator to the flask.
4. Titrate with 0.1 N NaOH until solution turn blue from green yellow.

Calculation:
H3BO3 (g/l) = ml of NaOH x 6.18

Regards,
David

David Shiu
David Shiu
- Singapore


April 10, 2014

thumbs up signThank you David,
Every method that I have so far lacks precision and accuracy.
I am going to try your method today.
Thanks again
Julia

Julia Gilliland [returning]
- Danbury Connecticut USA


April 10, 2014

A. I used someone's method of adding enough manitol to the sample to make a thin slurry. the 0.1N NaOH is important. 1N does not work. I either stirred this with a glass rod or used a magnetic flea. The end point is very repeatable.
You might try adding 1 more drop of indicator when you are very close to the end point. I actually could tell the imminent approach of the end point and then would add the indicator.
Strong NaOH or added far to fast will precipitate some of the nickel and give you an erratic false value.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


July 16, 2020

thumbs up sign David,

Your procedure gave me the best results by far for clarity of the endpoint. I hope Julia found it the most helpful as well.

Steve Trojan
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread SEARCH for Threads about ... My Topic Not Found: Start NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental Compliance


©1995-2020 finishing.com, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About finishing.com   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.