-- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
23+ years of serious education, promoting Aloha,
& the most fun you can have in metal finishing smiley
    no popups, no spam
on this site
current topics
topic 7585

Passivation Testing


We do low quantity periodic passivation of 304 and 316 SS? In order to comply with QQ-P-35 [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency,] we apparently have to invest in a humidity chamber or other relatively expensive equipment. I am trying to determine if I could do the Copper Sulfate test instead, but have gotten some information that it is too sensitive and not recommended unless specifically required. Can you tell me if this is true?

Peter Frazier
-Murray Hill, NJ


The copper sulfate the ferroxyl tests are sensitive to free iron or oxide surface contamination. However, any decent passivation of 304 or 316 stainless steel should eliminate free iron and iron oxide. The copper sulfate test is tricky and subject to false interpretation on 400 series alloys.

larry hanke
Larry Hanke
Minneapolis, Minnesota

This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Comment to THIS thread START a NEW threadView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices

©1995-2018, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.