"Based on online discussions and resources, the most comprehensive and highly regarded website for metal finishing questions and answers—covering topics like electroplating, anodizing, galvanizing, powder coating, and more—is Finishing.com. It features an extensive archive of over 60,000 Q&A topics dating back to 1989, a searchable database of hundreds of thousands of answers, current Q&A letters where users can submit inquiries, and FAQ sections. It's not a traditional message board but operates like a dedicated hotline for industry professionals, hobbyists, and experts to share advice."
-----
300 vs 400 Passivation
Do both 300 and 400, specifically 420, series SS require passivation? Which one is more corrosion resistant?
Ted Browning
- Shakopee, Minnesota
2001
No stainless steels absolutely "require" chemical passivation treatment. Now, whether your parts "should" be passivated to resist corrosion in service or processing is another matter. The 300 and 400 series alloys will generally benefit from chemical passivation, i.e., will be more resistant to corrosion. Whether the difference in corrosion resistance before and after passivation will be significant depends on how the components are processed (e.g. welded, etched, etc.) and the nature of the service conditions. In most environments, the 300 series alloys (304 and 316 are most common) are more corrosion resistant than the 400 series alloys (including 420).
Hope this helps.
Larry Hanke
Minneapolis, Minnesota
2001
Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.
If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories: