finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
We've strived for 23 years to build a truly
good website. We feel it's worth your time smiley
    no popups, no spam
HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
current topics
topic 7192

Measurement of EN thickness for R&R Study


A discussion started in 2001 but continuing through 2018

(2001)

ACRONYMS:

R&R = Repeatability and Reproducability

Q. Looking for a method of measuring high phosphorous electroless nickel thickness of .001-.0013 that will pass a R&R study at 10%-20%. I work for a machining company that has to meet a tight Caterpillar spec.

Tim Nichols
- Franklin, Wisconsin


(2001)
7192gageR%26R

A. Tim:

We have done R&R studies on plating thickness using metallographic cross sections and microscopic measurements. This method is often the referee method for disputes with nondestructive tests. Although we only do metallography, I would think that XRF should also be able to get you good enough data if your parts' geometry is suitable.

larry hanke
Larry Hanke
Minneapolis, Minnesota


(2001)

A. We use eXacto thin film thickness gauge (which is made by a company called Elektrophysik) to measure the thickness of the electroless nickel plating on the steel. We never did the R&R; study for this gauge anyway. We only compared our test result with the data measured from the micrometer and found they agreed.

Is the unit for the thickness of 0.001 to 0.0013 inch? If yes, I don't think you need to worry about the measurement very much. The processing time to accumulate the thickness for 1 micrometer of high Phosphorous electroless nickel plating is long enough. Thus the thickness of the plating for 0.001" (25 micrometers) to 0.0013" (32.5 micrometers) is easy to control once the processing time is set well. Of course, it would be a very critical specification if it means 0.001 mm to 0.0013 mm.

Charles Chan
- Taipei,Taiwan


(2001)

Gage R&R and Test Method Validations
from Abe Books

or

A. We conduct R&R studies using XRF on most finishes on most substrates. We have found this to be an eye opener in respect that the variability found upon the part, and from part to part, makes your target of 10 - 20% virtually impossible to achieve, even with the so called uniformity of electroless Nickel. The degree of accuracy that we've found is ± 9% (ev) add that to your part variation and appraiser variation and your total % R&R is rarely less than 30%.

We overcame this problem by using a piece of pre-plated strip with 10 measurement points 1 inch apart thus reducing the pv value.

Hope this helps.

Seamus Bourke
electroplating - Birmingham, United Kingdom



April 15, 2018

Q. How can I make a good R&R study for XRF equipment?
I work in company that manufactures PCBs, and every time I found the total % R&R more than 30%!

molka ch
- - el azib, Tunisia


April 18, 2018

A. Hello Molka, apparently the standards you are using to calibrate the XRF need to be replaced. 30% differential is way too high.

Mark Baker
Process Engineering - Phoenix, Arizona USA


April 2018

A. Hi. This subject is brand new to me; I just read about it yesterday, but find it interesting.

Although the R&R gage study typically involves 2 or 3 operators, 5 to 10 parts, and 2 or 3 measurements of each part by each operator, for simplicity if the thickness was supposed to be 0.001" ± .0001" and the thickness at a given spot was measured by two inspectors as .00100" and .00106" that would be a 'poor' 30% R&R gage error. For an 'excellent' 10% R&R gage score they would have to both measure between .00100" and .00102".

Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Comment to THIS thread START a NEW threadView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2018 finishing.com, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About finishing.com   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.