finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
(current
topics)
topic 6823

How does salt spray test equilibrate to normal aging process

adv.   auto technology banner

(2000)

How does salt spray test equilibrate to normal aging process and is there any faster way to do this test or any alternative test?

azman bakri
- shah alam,selangor,malaysia


First of two simultaneous responses-- (2000)

Salt spray testing cannot be directly correlated to real life. People have tried and have been unsuccessful. The best you can do is to set a standard on how well your part should last in salt spray, and assume that if the part does well in salt spray, then it will do well in real life.

There is no accurate and repeatable test that is faster. There are different types of corrosion testing, but usually they are chosen for specific types of plating. Besides salt spray there is: CASS testing, cyclic/complex corrosion test methods, sandbox testing, and SWAT/Kesternich testing.

I am sure if anyone had a quicker version of salt spray, everyone would be doing that test instead of this one. The big problem with accelerating corrosion testing is that the quicker you go, the less you represent the true chemical reaction of rusting.

tim neveau
Tim Neveau
Rochester Hills, Michigan


Second of two simultaneous responses-- (2000)

The salt spray test ( ASTM B117 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] ) is a process control tool. It does not, in itself, have a correlation to a product's service life. There are other tests which incorporate a salt spray cycle along with humidity, drying, etc. which have been found to provide correlation to field exposure. One of these tests is SAE J2334 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet]. There is substantial literature available on this test and its development.

Cynthia L. Meade
- Sylvania, Ohio, USA


January 9, 2013

Hi Azman. You got good advice from both sides. Cynthia is no doubt correct that the cyclic test is an improvement, but Tim is right that it still will not correlate well.

Consider hot-dip galvanized coatings: no finish in the world will outlast them (75 years with no maintenance is not uncommon), yet other finishes easily outperform them in accelerated corrosion tests. Why? Because the corrosion products themselves are an essential component of the corrosion resistance. Galvanized coatings slowly react with the small amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere over the course of months, years, and decades to form a glassy and impermeable zinc carbonate surface layer that is outstanding at blocking further corrosion. But in an accelerated corrosion chamber, those corrosion products can't form, so you aren't testing the real-world performance of the galvanized coating.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.