Authoritative Answers, Fun, & Aloha -- no cost, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
Site 🔍
pub     mobile?
Metal finishing Q&As since 1989


FAIR 9102 Question re. Chromating & Anodizing

none is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

FAIR = First article inspection report

Q. Hello ,
Our customer stated the surface treatment as followed on the drawing:

MIL-C-5541, Class 3 - passivation with surtec 650, black anodized.

The parts are almost completely black anodized and only some areas are masked for electrical contact.

As we have to do a FAIR 9102 (AS 9102) my question is if the above mentioned MIL is sufficient to specify the treatments.

For my understanding the parts will be chromated and than masked and black anodized to get the final result.

For black anodizing MIL-A-8625 [on DLA], Type II, Class 2, black is normally used do we have to add this to the drawing or is 5541 sufficient?

Thanks for your help.

Xzibi Hatle
- Hamburg Germany
December 19, 2022

A. Hi Xzibi,
Chromate conversion coating and anodizing are totally separate processes; so, while specifying MIL-C-5541 gives a standard to follow for the chromate conversion coating, it says nothing about the anodizing. I think you most definitely must add "per Mil-A-8625 Type II, Class 2" after "Black anodized".

I have no experience with FAIR but am under the impression that it requires quite a bit of detail in the sequence of operations.
Luck & Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha - Pine Beach, New Jersey

Q. Hi Ted,
Thanks for your feedback, much appreciated . From my research I found that also the MIL-C-5541 is now MIL-DTL-5541 as the customer wants Surtec 650 I guess we should also refer to the newest norm?

Xzibi Hatle [returning]
- Hamburg Germany
December 20, 2022

A. Hi again. I have no experience with FAIR and can't advise exactly what should go on the forms, but you don't want to change them unnecessarily. So, you probably should start with MIL-DTL-5541 [on DLA] rather than an outdated spec.

Surtec 650 is a proprietary rather than a generic process, but a customer can certainly specify a proprietary if they wish.
Luck & Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha - Pine Beach, New Jersey

A. Most FAI parts in the US require the latest rev be used. In this case, MIL-DTL-5541F is what we put on our paperwork.

As Ted said, Surtec 650 is proprietary. It has taken the place of Alodine 600. I have some clients that require us to list the exact product info on the cert, some do not.

John Hatfield
- Vonore, Tennessee
January 19, 2024

(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Chemicals &
& Software

About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"