Problem? Solution? Chime right in!
(perhaps the world's last 'no registration' site)
"Okay to anodize small loads and largely empty racks?"
Q. We are starting up a production line for anodize and we are designing the racks; I have designed a rack that can hold 200 parts, now we are informed that we have to anodize 50 at the time, due to our customer's flow. Is it important that the parts is evenly distributed at the tank/rack, or is ok that we only have parts at the top 30-40%Poul Slot Mikkelsen
- Vildbjerg Denmark
A. Hi Poul. If you were electroplating this would be a very serious problem because there would be so much anode area feeding the bottom of the rack that the bottom row of parts, especially their lower edges, would get much too much thickness. Because anodizing is an insulating film your problem will be much less severe; I don't think it will actually be a practical problem, but hopefully some highly experienced anodizers will correct me if I'm wrong.
Hopefully volume will soon be increased because you'll probably find that operating an anodizing line at 25% of its capacity is not economically viable in the long run :-(
Luck & Regards,
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Aloha -- an idea worth spreading
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
March 21, 2021
A. Cramming your parts in one area of your rack can only lead to problems. And the problems may be worse if you only use the top of the rack. Evenly spread out parts is the way to go, and dummy plates/parts in the empty areas might also be necessary.
Ladson, South Carolina
March 27, 2021
A. The two racking methods will not cause obvious difference, because sulphuric acid have a great fluidity, you will not feel obvious difference on each position in one part indeed, so racking location don't need more focus on. however if the part is too big or distance of two parts is too close that maybe disturb thickness uniformityRyan Chao
- Wuxi China