Home /
T.O.C.
FAQs
 
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
Here
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Search 🔍
the Site

Problem? Solution? Chime right in!
(perhaps the world's last 'no registration' site)

-----

"Vibratory finishing leaves smut on stainless steel"



November 13, 2018

Q. I recently purchased a Rosler E420 Vibe Bowl and Z800 Centrifuge. The equipment was purchased to debur some long thin flat 302 stainless parts. The deburring process is working well, but we are getting a gray smutty surface film on the parts that does not come off during passivation. Any ideas on how to eliminate the smut?

Kurt Dube
Engineer - Southington, Connecticut
^


November 15, 2018

A. Kurt,
I'd reach out to your chemical vendor. I've seen smut on brass vibratory processes before and we pumped a low concentration specialty cleaner recommended by our vendor through and it cleaned them all right up. I had tried some homebrew acid mixes and other burnishes first and nothing was nearly as effective.

Jameson Grout
- Agawam, Massachusetts
^


December 8, 2018

A. Are your parts flat? If they nest during the processing, then you may want to look into dry organic abrasive process media

tony kenton
AF Kenton
Hatboro, Pennsylvania
^


December 10, 2018

Q. The parts are flat and narrow. .030 thick x .128 wide x 5-1/2 long. I've been working with a local chemist to come up with a solution to remove the smut. Conventional alkaline cleaners and nitric have not done a very good job in removing the smut. So far we found ultrasonic cleaning with a special formulated cleaner design to help remove the smut to be the best solution.

Kurt S. Dube [returning]
Medical Components - Southington, Connecticut, USA
^


December 12, 2018

A. I am a big fan of ultrasonic cleaning systems; however, I you want to try a mechanical system, try a mass finishing system using dry organic media with pumice.

tony kenton
AF Kenton
Hatboro, Pennsylvania
^


December 13, 2018

Q. Thanks AF,

This week I tried running parts in corn cob media to remove the oil from the stamping operation, and it worked very well.

I then ran the parts in corn cob media after vibratory deburr to remove the surface smut, and this too worked very well. The two extra operations add some additional time and cost, but this option is still better than sending the parts outside.

Do you think adding pumice to the corn cob would be beneficial? If so, what ratio should I use?

Kurt S. Dube [returning]
Medical Components - Southington, Connecticut, USA
^


December 18, 2018

A. If you are having good results with dry media, stay with it. If you are taking too long, by adding 120 grit pumice you will speed up the cleaning cycle, but may still need the finish without pumice.

tony kenton
AF Kenton
Hatboro, Pennsylvania
^

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread SEARCH for Threads about ... My Topic Not Found: Start NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2021 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA