finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
23+ years of serious education, promoting Aloha,
& the most fun you can have in metal finishing smiley
    no popups, no spam
HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
current topics
topic 60772

U-shape vs in-line zinc electroplating


June 4, 2018

Q. My situation: We are currently operating a straight electroplating line with racking and un-racking at the same end. We are considering to re-configure our line in U-shape. Has anyone done this? What are the main advantages to go to U-shape line?

Frank Routhier
Crd Placage - Drummondville, Qc, Can


June 2018

A. Hi Frank. Please tell us whether this is an automatic vs. a manual line, whether it is rack vs. barrel plating, and whether your shop has one or two plating lines vs. a dozen.

But regardless, a U-shape line involves more equipment and is more expensive, but will offer higher production, more loading/unloading flexibility, and less potential for dragover contamination. The only time I think U-shaped lines are the wrong approach is if you have a whole bunch of plating lines which you could align in neat rows of straight lines, loaded and unloaded in a neat row but where U-shape lines vs. building shape would necessitate arranging lines with load-unload areas scattered in different orientations, which is a logistical problem.

Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"


June 5, 2018

Q. Thanks Ted,
It's a single manual rack line.

I would assume the increase in cost is mostly due to the hoist. Also, the transfer between cleaning side and electroplating/finishing.

Why the U-shape gives more production?

Thanks again.

Frank Routhier [returning]
Crd Placage - Drummondville, Qc, Can


June 2018

A. Hi Frank. The higher production with one manual hoist is probably minimal, due just to the fact that the work only has to be carried forward and never backward, for a more efficient time-motion diagram. Try drawing a time-motion diagram for conveying the work through the line with the correct immersion time range in each tank and estimate the productivity if the hoist keeps moving.

But if you add a second hoist, or automate, the hoists not being in each other's way helps productivity too. With an automated line you would use at least one hoist on each side, and would use a transfer shuttles on the back end of the line as well as the front, rather than a U-shaped track.

Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Comment to THIS thread START a NEW threadView CURRENT TOPICS



Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2018 finishing.com, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About finishing.com   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.