Home /
T.O.C.
FAQs
 
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
Here
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Search 🔍
the Site

Problem? Solution? Chime right in!
(perhaps the world's last 'no registration' site)

-----

"What thickness of zinc from electrogalvanizing to be appropriate for chromate conversion coating"



January 25, 2016

Q. Dear Sir,

I am a student in a university in the Bangkok. I want to know about, What is the thickness from electrogalvanized process that can be appropriate for chromate conversion coating? Why?

Regards,

Suvanit Leksakorn
student - Bangkok,Thailand
^


January 2016

affil. link
Zinc Plating
by Herb Geduld
from Abe Books
or

A. Hi Suvanit. I think chromate conversion coating is appropriate for any and all thicknesses of zinc electroplating. Why would we think different? Please reveal your thinking on the subject instead of posing it so abstractly, and we may be able to flesh out the answer for you. Thanks.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
^


February 18, 2016

A. I (for one) am not comfortable with the term 'electrogalvanizing.' The implication is that it is the same in some way as hot dip galvanizing. That is not true; it has significantly less thickness and therefore significantly less corrosion protection than zinc electroplating. Ted is right to call it electroplating, because that is what it is.

"Conversion coating," however, is a meaningful term. It means that the process CONVERTS zinc to a passivate. Therefore, there needs to be enough zinc for the conversion process not to consume all of the zinc. So some conversion processes convert a lot of the zinc, and some convert very little. In general, the more zinc is converted, the thicker the film and the greater the corrosion protection. To give a few examples:
(1) Old hex blue-bright chromates converted very little zinc and offered little corrosion protection. 'Commercial zinc' (i.e., all surfaces were plated) would tolerate a blue-bright.
(2) Black hex chromates (silver black) required a fairly high thickness of zinc; some platers wouldn't do black unless they had five tenths.
(3) Newer 'thick film' trivalent passivates require more zinc thickness than thin film trivalent passivates.

tom_rochester
Tom Rochester Plating Systems & Technologies, Inc.  


supporting advertiser
CTO - Jackson, Michigan, USA

plating systems & technologies banner ad
^


February 2016

thumbs up signHi Tom. Thanks for the insights that I never thought about and didn't realize! My response to Suvanit was just a reflection of my belief that zinc electroplating is invariably chromate conversion coated regardless of its thickness.

I agree that the term "commercial zinc" was widely used, but I never liked it :-)

Hopefully we're moving completely away from 'commercial zinc' and towards a minimum of ASTM B633 [affil. link to spec at Techstreet] 5 micron zinc even for mild exposure. Are you suggesting that if one uses thick film chromates, 5 micron might not be sufficient? -- similar to how it was insufficient for silver-based black chromate (another thing I didn't know!)

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
^


February 26, 2016

Q. Hi Ted Mooney & Tom Rochester

Thanks for the great information! I had more of a question regarding the zinc plating solution with conversion coating.

In my thesis, study of zinc plating on steel prepared from non-cyanide zinc bath and acid zinc bath, when compared with acid zinc solution by salt spray test 24 hours about 2 case.
The first case, sample without conversion coating found that sample from non-cyanide bath has white rust occurrence resistance better than plating by acid zinc bath. Sample that plating by non-cyanide found the white rust at time 1 hour but for the sample that plating by acid zinc found white rust at 30 minutes.
But in the second case, sample that zinc plating with conversion coating solution pH 1.8 has the timing of white rust occurrence of acid zinc plating and conversion coating is more than 7 hours but for the non-cyanide and conversion coating The timing of white rust occurrence is about 4 hours. So acid zinc bath with conversion coating has corrosion resistance more than non-cyanide bath with conversion coating.
I would like to know why pH of coating solution of conversion coating, which came from zinc plating by different plating solution, are different ? And what range of pH of conversion coating solution that suitable for zinc plating from non-cyanide ?

I apologize if there are any errors.
Regards,

Suvanit Leksakorn [returning]
- Bangkok,Thailand
^

none
finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread SEARCH for Threads about ... My Topic Not Found: Start NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2021 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA