Home /
T.O.C.
FAQs
 
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
Here
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Search 🔍
the Site

World's #1 finishing resource since 1989
No login needed: Chime right in

topic 59609

Electroless nickel for EMI/RFI shielding on aluminum



April 22, 2014

Q. I am a technician working on a balloon-borne physics experiment. As part of the experiment, we require our electronics enclosures to be EMI sealed up to 2 Ghz or so. I am not very familiar with electroless nickel and had a few questions. We will be coating aluminum alloys. For a lot of our parts we use the chemfilm/Iridite/Alodine conversion coating, Class 3, but the nickel coating has more wear resistance and we would like to use it on areas where we are extra concerned about a seal. Some of the housings we use come from the supplier with a nickel coating, but we will be custom manufacturing some components and I would like to know what specifications I need to be concerned about.

1) Are there any recommendations on thickness or phosphorous content for this application? We fly our experiment over Antarctica, so I don't believe we are too concerned about corrosion. I don't know if a thicker coating is worse for EMI purposes.

2) I have read that some people recommend first coating the aluminum with copper, is that common?

3) What about electroless nickel and fine threads? One of our panels is about .16" thick with tapped 4-40 through holes in it. Are there any concerns about the threads getting excessive nickel depositing? Should we use an oversized tap first? We also may construct some housings with 2-56 blind holes, does electroless nickel work for those?

Thanks you,

Brian

Brian H
Student Technician - Honolulu, Hawaii


May 13, 2014

A. Brian,
1. Why not use copper instead of nickel? That is more common for EMI shielding. P content doesn't matter much but high P (10%) would be fine. For example, airplane landing gear sometimes has very high P content to protect against environmental conditions.
2. Yes, that is common.
3. In my experience, an EMI shielding layer is fairly thick so, yes, the threads should be taken into consideration. One idea is to not plate the threads.

blake kneedler
Blake Kneedler
Feather Hollow Eng. - Stockton, California

none
finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread SEARCH for Threads about ... My Topic Not Found: Start NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2021 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA