-- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

on this site
current topics
topic 58854

Electroless nickel counterflow rinse troubleshooting

August 31, 2012

Q. Hello,
I have recently introduced a counter flow rinse system after my electroless nickel bath.
There are three tanks:
1. DM water ( should be hot, but my heat exchanger is being fabricated)
2. DM water + NH3 ( at about >1% v/v)
3. DM water.
I am facing the following problems.

1. After the 3rd day of operation, the first tank develops a foul odor, the closest smell I can compare it to is stale sweat.
2. small clumps of particulate matter are observed floating about in the first rinse tank.The look a bit like the film of cream formed when hot milk is cooled.
3. By the end of the 4th day of operation the water in the first rinse tank spontaneously decomposes forming a fine black precipitate.

I have tried filtering the rinse but this has not been much help.
I would really appreciate any insight that can be provided.

I thank you for your time.

Ravi Patel
- Anand, Gujarat, India

September 4, 2012

A. Hi.
I have questions. Your design of the 3 tank c/flow rinse is due to customer requirements or your own design? If your own design, what are you trying to achieve?

SK Cheah
- Penang, Malaysia

September 7, 2012

Q. I'm trying to reduce the amount of waste water generated by process.
I hope to tune it too a point where I don't have to dump my final Electroless nickel plating rinse, using it as addition instead.

Ravi Patel [returning]
- Anand, Gujarat, India

First of two simultaneous responses -- September 8, 2012

A. The sweat-like smell may be due to lactic acid which is a component of sweat.

Dilute organic acids are an excellent media for growing molds. Your problem may disappear when the rinse becomes more concentrated, or if it is heated.

Lyle Kirman
consultant - Cleveland, Ohio

Second of two simultaneous responses -- September 8, 2012

A. Electrochemical baths are "balanced", when properly operated they remain stable over extended periods of time. Theoretically, they do not produce waste chemicals, only metallic deposits, water and sometimes hydrogen, oxygen or other gases that escape to the atmosphere and have to be compensated adding acids or other chemicals. Their rinses contain salts that are still usable. Electrons have not yet reduced them.
On the other hand, EN baths produce waste by-products all the time (generally sodium orthophosphite) which builds up inexorably and is a contaminant. Rinsing will only dilute it, it will never reverse the reaction and provide fresh hypophosphite.
Bill Marrufo-Mexico

Guillermo Marrufo
Monterrey, NL, Mexico

September 10, 2012

A. Well stated GM.
Another point is why abuse the EN tank and get 4 turnovers when you could take care of it and get 8 turnovers? Waste disposal of a dead EN solution is a lot more expensive than rinse water unless you have a place to sell the dead solution.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida

September 11, 2012

Q. Dear GM and JW,
Thanks. We haven't dumped a bath since 2008; we have an in-process electrodialysis/IX system that we use to rejuvenate spent baths and recover any stray nickel.
So the question, gentlemen, is meant to be about the rinsing system, and any methods that can help reduce the amount of water consumed.

Ravi Patel
- Anand, Gujarat, India

September 12, 2012

A. Hi Ravi.

Since you apparently have the technology to purify the electroless nickel solution, and since the three rinse tanks are already counterflowed, perhaps you should just pump the first rinse counterflow back into the EN tank, but through a filter to exclude the flotsam and jetsam? Even better might be recirclating the initial rinse through a filter constantly, with a slipstream going to a float valve for makeup of evaporation losses in the ENP tank.


Ted Mooney,
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Pine Beach, New Jersey

September 17, 2012

thumbs up signThanks Ted,
I have been doing trials for filtration, but this has turned into a counter productive exercise. The fluid circulation is aerating the rinse causing formation of large clumps of flotsam, My guess is some form of oxidation involving the organic acids present in the rinse.
I think I am going to temporarily set aside this experiment and concentrate on reducing drag out to the rinse tank instead.
I thank you all for your responses.

Ravi Patel
- Anand, Gujarat, India

This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site


Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices

©1995-2018, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.