No passwords, no registration, no paywalls, no popups, no AI

As an Amazon Associate & eBay Partner we earn from affil links

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
SITE
NEWS
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry Search our quarter-million Q&As

Home of the finishing HOTLINE since 1989

-----

Stainless steel finishes for chemical reactors (emulsion polimerization reactors)




Hi all,

I am a PhD student and I would like to know which finishes are used in Stainless steel chemical reactors (specifically in polymer emulsion reactors), I mean, if is possible for a company to have a reactor electropolished, or if always is 2B finish or what is, cause really I am not able to find it.

I am chemist, not engineer, so if someone could tell me which standards I could read (cause I see in internet some webs that talk about ASTM etc....). I know is not a trivial question and there is not a unique answer, but maybe we could say that typically for example 2B is chosen, or which is the criterion for the election of the finish.

Thanks in advance and have a nice day!

Jone

Jone Fernandez
pHD student - Spain
March 1, 2011




Dear Jone,
In these polymer emulsion reactors and heat exchangers, you want to avoid polymerisation and build up of the product.
Therefore you need a smooth and "micro-deburred" surface.
The Stainless Steel used for construction is mostly 2B or mechanically polished to a roughness Ra below 0.6 ��m. Then you have to electropolish your reactor to realise the smooth, easy to clean, non-stick surface. The final roughness Ra after electropolishing will be below 0.4 ��m. But it is not the roughness that counts, it is the smooth, micro-deburred surface that gives the non-stick properties. In this application, it is better to have an electropolish surface with a Ra 0.8 ��m than a non-electropolished surface with a Ra 0.4 ��m.
Kind regards. Marc.

Marc Quaghebeur
- Diksmuide Belgium Europe
March 3, 2011


Sorry! Finishing.com is temporarily Read-Only.
Ted Mooney is retiring but I have several offers to take it over.
We're working hard to make sure we find it the best new home.





Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2026 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"