Home /
T.O.C.
FAQs
 
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
Here
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Search 🔍
the Site
pub Where the world gathers for
plating, anodizing, & finishing Q&As since 1989





-----

Accepted method for checking thickness of pure tin plating





July 6, 2010

Q. One of our customers is doing thickness monitoring on their pure tin plated parts. In-house checking is done using XRF machine which we check both front and back side with an average of 11-12 microns. But on the customer side, which is using a cross-section to check the thickness, the thickness range is 8-40 microns.

Can you please help identify the difference of each method and which is more accurate. Is it standard to do cross-section to check the plating thickness?

Please advise.

Alfred Yu Jr.
Plating Engineer - Singapore



July 6, 2010

A. Hi, Alfred. Cross-sectioning is almost always considered the "referee" method except for too-thin coatings where smearing is inevitable. Although it's possible to do it poorly and thereby get inaccurate results, you can't argue with a good cross-sectioning.

Cross-sectioning, however, is a destructive test which can only be used on sample parts, , whereas XRF can be used on production parts without harming them. A portion of your problem may be inaccurate calibration of your machine, and a portion of the problem may be testing at different points on the part (the thickness of electroplated coatings can vary dramatically across a part).

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey



July 6, 2010

If this part has sharp edges, it could easily have 4 times the amount of plate than the center of the part. I would first get a new set of certified standards for your XRF. Then I would ask to see their specimen mount that had 40 mills of plate. It is easy to grind ( wet sand off another 100 mills of the entire mount and re-polish, etch/stain and read the mount. If there is a major difference from the first readings, then the customer is not doing a good job in the sectioning of the part for the sample. I can make the sample read nearly anything that you want by choosing where I cut the sample from.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida


none
finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2023 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA