Home /
T.O.C.
FAQs
 
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
Here
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Search 🔍
the Site
pub Where the world gathers for
plating, anodizing, & finishing Q&As since 1989







-----

Cost Implications of Specifying Hard Coat Anodized Finish



June 28, 2010

Hello and thanks to all the industry experts out there.
I have already learned a tremendous amount from observing this forum, and I am hoping to gain some additional insight.
I am an engineer currently specifying the anodic coating of aluminum parts and want to know what the cost implications are for using a specification such as MIL-A-8625 Type III Class 1, unsealed, or SAE AMS2469 [affil. link], unsealed (vs. other types of coatings and architectural spec anodized finishes).
In the application, we are concerned primarily with dielectric separation, adhesion, and durability -- general corrosion resistance is secondary. The aluminum parts will be 6061-T6, extruded and machined, generally less than 10" max. dimension.
I would like to know if there is a high $$ premium and/or lead time for this type of coating associated with the testing requirements.
Should we indicate performing only the testing we feel is appropriate and waive the rest? (i.e. only perform thickness and abrasion resistance tests) Or is that a recipe for trouble down the line?
Thank you,

John DeKraker
architect/engineer - Washington, DC, USA



July 1, 2010

Hardcoat or Type III anodize is a much thicker, denser version of a commercial or Type II anodize. As such, hard anodize provides superior dielectric, wear, and corrosion resistant properties. However, due to the increased electrical power and processing time requirements, hardcoat is also much more expensive. This added cost is not primarily a function of the testing requirements but rather the differences in processing parameters.

Chris Jurey, Past-President IHAA
Luke Engineering & Mfg. Co. Inc.
supporting advertiser
Wadsworth, Ohio
luke banner


none
finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2023 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA