No passwords, no registration, no paywalls, no popups, no AI

As an Amazon Associate & eBay Partner we earn from affil links

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
SITE
NEWS
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry Search our quarter-million Q&As

Home of the finishing HOTLINE since 1989

-----:

Tartaric-sulfuric acid anodizing

Quickstart:
     Readers wanting a quick understanding of aluminum anodizing may wish to start with our "Aluminum Anodizing: Intro & FAQs".
     Type 3 anodizing, designed for thin coatings and non-corrosive residuals, has been traditionally based on chromic acid. But concern over the toxicity of chromic acid, and it being effectively forbidden by European RoHS and REACH standards, has led to substitutions including tartaric-sulfuric acid (TSA) anodizing.
     Read on, join in ...





(this entry appended to this thread by editor in lieu of spawning a duplicative thread)
Q. What is TSA Anodising, who introduced it, who will provide certificate to implement it in a company, what is the composition?

Naushad Pasha
employee - Bengaluru, India
February 13, 2026




⇩ Similar, related, Q&As -- oldest first ⇩



probertEthumb
Aluminum How-To
"Chromating - Anodizing - Hardcoating"

by Robert Probert

You'll love this book. Finishing.com has sold a thousand copies without a return request  🙂

Q. tartaric acid on eBay or Amazon [affil link] anodizing (TSA) and boric sulfuric acid anodizing (BSAA) are developed as alternatives to chromic acid anodizing due to REACH regulations. We are looking for an alternative to chemical conversion coating meeting the requirements of MIL-DTL-5541 [⇦ this spec on DLA] and MIL-DTL-81706 [⇦ this spec on DLA] .

For the being time, we are using Alodine 1200s. Alodine 1200s is insulating material itself, however when we apply to Aluminum surface thin layers, we obtain Class 1A and Class 3 coatings according to MIL-DTL-5541 where the parts are conducting electricity.
My question is: if we apply thin layers of TSA or BSAA can we obtain Class 1A or Class 3 parts?
Thank you in advance

AYSUN AKIN
ENGINEER - ANKARA, TURKEY
October 30, 2008


A. Aysun,

Anodising is not conversion coating and so will not meet the requirements of MIL-DTL-5541 [⇦ this spec on DLA] regardless of class.

What you need to do is talk to your customer and see if they would consider TSA or BSAA as a replacement for the MIL-DTL-5541.

The other possibility, if it is allowed by your customer, is to try the non-chromate conversion coatings. Again make sure you communicate with your customer at all times as this will involve a design change and could potentially affect the functionality of the part.

Brian Terry
Aerospace - Yeovil, Somerset, UK
November 5, 2008


Update: Hi Aysun

Times have changed and there has been great progress with MIL-DTL-5541 coatings. TCP (trivalent chromate product) coatings are now allowed, and there are Qualified Products Listed in MIL-DTL-81706. These are called Type 2 coatings.

Luck & Regards,

ted_yosem
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
Striving to live Aloha

finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey

Need quick confidential answers? $25
Need project assistance? $100/hr.




Q. I hope someone can help. Our company has been asked about converting to tartaric acid /sulfuric anodising from Chromic acid anodising due to our customers desire to comply with the European REACH legislation. As REACH relates to 'substances of concern' being present in the finished article, then is there any Chromate in the surface of a component that has been chromic acid anodised? If not, then surely the REACH legislation should not apply to CAA finishes.
Thanks in advance for any response given.

Mark Lees
company chemist - Isle of Man, British Isles
February 24, 2010


simultaneous replies

A. Yes, CAA has chromate in the finish, however, for REACH compliance you may be able to claim an "article exemption". Read more about REACH as it applies to metal finishing here:
https://www.nmfrc.org/compliance/reach.cfm

Tartaric-sulfuric acid anodizing and boric-sulfuric acid anodizing are both replacement chemistries aimed at eliminating the chrome of chromic anodizing. It may make business sense to switch to one of these processes anyway rather than try to achieve an article exemption under REACH. BSAA is much more of a tried & true process by many shops in the U.S. compared to TSAA.

There is one more thing to consider. A switch to TSAA or BSAA doesn't necessarily ensure REACH compliance as those coatings, last time I checked, still relied on a dilute chromate seal.

Jon Barrows
Jon Barrows, MSF, EHSSC
Independence MO

Ed. update 2026: The above link redirects to www.caiweb.com/shutdown.html, which advises that "... that content will no longer be maintained nor updated".
Thankfully, the Internet Archive preserved a copy here  🙂
Please consider a donation to The Internet Archive. Never follow abandoned links or redirects to other sites! Because such links are found on trusted sites, hackers anxiously seek them for installation of malware onto your computer.


A. Mark,

I am assuming that someone has asked if any of your parts contain Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs)at concentrations greater than 0.1% in accordance with Article 33 of the regulations.

The current SVHCs listed that contain hexavalent chromium are the following:

Sodium dichromate (both anhydrous and dihydrate)
Lead sulphochromate yellow (C.I. pigment yellow 34)
Lead chromate molybdate sulphate red (C.I. pigment red 104)
Lead chromate

Chromic acid anodising utilises chromium (VI) oxide and is not currently listed as a SVHC and so does not need reporting. Even if some of the chromium (VI) oxide was left on the surface, it still doesn't come under the reporting requirements of REACH.

I will say that I expect chromium (VI) oxide to be included in one of the next two or three SVHC lists (currently being published annually), so it will only be a short stay of execution before it does come under Article 33 reporting requirements.

Brian Terry
Aerospace - Yeovil, Somerset, UK




"The Chemical Analysis of Electroplating Solutions"
by Terrance H Irvine
irvine_chemical_analysis
on Amazon
or eBay
or AbeBooks
(affil link)
"Analysis of Electroplating & Related Solutions"
by Langford & Parker
langford
on Amazon

or AbeBooks
(affil link)

 

Q. There is talk of a tartaric acid-sulfuric acid solution that is being tried. If anyone can give me a procedure for the analysis of the total acid by titration with the use of a burette I would be very happy. ⇦ Answer?

Michael Boissinopt
Electro plating - Southend Essex, United Kingdom
May 20, 2010


Q. Currently having to set a Chemical Analytical Laboratory from scratch to help support the new anodising production line which is not installed yet.
Cannot find any standard methods to analyse Tartaric Sulfuric Acid bath and maintain the pH.
Has anyone got any methods to analyse the solution? ⇦ Answer?

Anthony Hopker
- United Kingdom
May 15, 2012


Sorry! Finishing.com is temporarily Read-Only.
Ted Mooney is retiring but I have several offers to take it over.
We're working hard to make sure we find it the best new home.





Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2026 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"