Galvanic Corrosion Stainless Steel: Smart but Short-Lived

Summary for galvanic corrosion stainless steel Discussion

Galvanic corrosion on a stainless steel rod with carbon steel nut is discussed as a sacrificial-anode idea. Craig Stewart asked whether a plain carbon steel nut on a stainless steel rod would protect the rod in seawater. The answerer said yes, in principle, the steel nut should act as a sacrificial anode and help protect the stainless rod, but only for a short time because its life would be brief in seawater. The reply also distinguished this from the steel-wool-on-stainless-sink example, suggesting that steel wool causes rusting by embedding tiny steel particles into the stainless surface rather than by acting as a useful sacrificial anode. The overall takeaway is that the concept is chemically plausible, but it is not a practical long-term corrosion protection method.

Q. Will a carbon steel nut on a stainless steel rod act as an anode to help prevent the rod from corroding if they are submerged in seawater?

I read another similar post here that used an example of steel wool on a stainless steel sink causing it to rust. However, it seems that the carbon steel nut would act as a sacrificial anode and protect the rod. Is that not correct?

Thanks,

Craig

Craig Stewart
student – Winston-Salem, North Carolina
March 2, 2010

A. Interesting question, Craig. It’s nice to see students thinking. Yes, a plain steel nut should serve as a sacrificial anode on a stainless steel rod, but probably not a very practical one because it’s life would be short.

I think steel wool causes rusting of stainless steel by imbedding small particles of steel into it.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha

finishing.com – Pine Beach, New Jersey



Need quick confidential answers? $25
Need project assistance? $100/hr.