No cost, no registration, no passwords -- just aloha, fun & authoritative answers
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

Passivation of investment cast stainless parts




I'm a mechanical engineer specifying the finish steps required for an investment cast stainless part (CF-8M, most likely) and I'm a little unsure of whether passivation is truly necessary for my application. I understand the basics of iron contamination and the general need for passivation in machined parts, but I'm new to investment cast parts.

Could someone please elaborate on the need (or lack thereof) to passivate solution-annealed CF-8M for a non-medical, non-food, low-stress part that would be used in a piece of winter sports equipment? The part is about the size of a car key and has an expected lifetime of about four years, most of that time spent inside at room temperature and up to approximately 200 hours per year outside in the snow at 20 degrees F. Very rarely will it be under stress. It needs to be generally corrosion resistant, so that it doesn't exhibit significant discoloration, but it doesn't have severe service requirements or a long life, so I don't know whether it can get by without it. Thanks in advance.

Jeff Cox
Mechanical Engineer - Golden, Colorado, USA
September 8, 2009


If there are any mechanical operations done on this part or if it connects to dissimilar metal, it would be a reasonable idea to passivate it. I would take a very wild guess and say that you probably could get away without it, but no one will know for sure until it is put into actual operation.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida
September 10, 2009



As far as SS castings versus machined parts, cast surfaces generally need passivation more. On parts that are castings with further machining done to say half the part, the half with the original untouched casted surface will rust first when you stress it. There also tends to be better results if the cast surface has been bead blasted, though it's usually done more for appearance's sake.

That said, given the application you described I'd say there's a decent chance you could get by well enough without passivating.

ray kremer
Ray Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner
September 17, 2009



October 6, 2009

Thanks, guys. I think we'll be giving it a try without passivation first and see how it goes.

--Jeff

Jeff Cox
- Golden, Colorado, USA




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"