Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no registration, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

Sustainability issues: galvanizing vs. alternatives




Q. I am currently writing an environmental report for our furniture company and assessing the materials and finishes we use. Galvanizing is currently used on a number of products to provide corrosion resistance under a powder coating finish. I would be very grateful if anyone could shed some light on the environmental benefits of galvanizing, or if there are more sustainable/environmentally effective processes that could be used.

Cara Bett
furniture designer - Falmouth, UK
July 27, 2009



"Handbook of Hot Dip Galvanization"
by Maass & Peissker

on AbeBooks

or eBay or

Amazon

(affil links)

A. Hi, Cara. Even small subsets of sustainability and environmental effectiveness, like cradle to grave energy requirement, usually prove intractable. There was worldwide furor, and then scorn for a formerly reputable research company that released a report that the cradle-to-grave energy requirement for a Hummer H-3 was less than a Prius. One of the things learned was that it is virtually impossible to capture even this subset of environmental costs.

When we stop subsidizing things so all sustainability and environmental costs are captured in the real world price (they're not yet, but we're continuously getting closer), then the best indicator of sustainability and environmental effectiveness will be cost effectiveness. Galvanizing is expensive compared to other technologies like phosphatizing. So, if the component is reliable enough and long lasting enough with a phosphate treatment instead of galvanizing, I think that is a more sustainable and environmentally effective approach. But if phosphatizing isn't "good enough", then galvanizing the component is more sustainable and environmentally effective than continually repainting or remanufacturing the item because it fails due to corrosion :-)

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
July 28, 2009


A. Actually you're in luck.
There's bags of info on the sustainable aspects of galvanizing, and even books about it. Prof Woolley from Cardiff? Univ among others has studied this.
You can find much info at http://www.sustainable-galvanizing.com/

If you want the book, call the IK Galvanizers Association, they'll likely send it to you free.

geoff_crowley
Geoff Crowley
Crithwood Ltd.
Westfield, Scotland, UK
crithwood logo
July 31, 2009


July 31, 2009

A. Cara,

Hot Dip Galvanizing with a powder paint coating is the best steel protection that I know. It is truly a premium coating. On my ranch, I prefer hot dip galvanizing to virtually any other steel coating because it lasts a lifetime in this rural area. I do not know a better steel protection for your application.

Several years ago I saw two center pivot irrigation systems that were for sale and were exactly alike (same year, make and model). One was painted, the other hot dip galvanized. The asking price for the hot dip galvanized was double what the painted one was.

Regards,

Dr. Thomas H. Cook
Galvanizing Consultant - Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA



September 20, 2010

Which process can be called a Greener process:

Hot Dip Galv or Electro Zn plating.

Why?

Paul Sekhri
Business Owner - New Delhi, India



Hi, Paul. Despite my respect for Geoff, plus spending some time reading the papers at galvanizeit.org, I completely disagree that it is possible at this point in our knowledge to assign a "greener" label to hot dip galvanizing vs. zinc electroplating. Further, since hot-dip coatings are much thicker, and serve different needs and markets than zinc plating, such comparison become even sillier.

We still don't know whether a daily cup of coffee or a daily shot of bourbon is overall good or bad for our health yet -- the results from research studies change every month . . . yet we presume to claim which products, from mine to landfill, are better for the future of the whole ecospape? It is "feel goodism" run amok, and beyond ludicrous. Just my opinion.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
September 21, 2010


none
adv.
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"