Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub
Metal finishing Q&As since 1989


-----

Prevention of "splinter" formation on C360 brass during 240 grit belting.





June 26, 2009

I'm the Finishing Manager at a plumbing products manufacturer. We apply a variety of decorative finishes to brass substrates and encounter the formation of brass "splinters" on the surface after 180 or 240 grit aluminum oxide belting. These defects are small (perhaps 100 - 200 microns long) but after nickel plating they become large enough to catch lint particles and after clear lacquering they appear as "dirt under the lacquer" (see image).

The clear lacquer magnifies the particle size due to the lens effect. The defects appear on sheet metal, castings and forgings but the severity seems to have a correlation to the source of the brass. The slivers could possibly be removed through the use of an etch process before plating but I'd rather correct the root cause as opposed to adding additional processes. My question is can these defects be prevented by changing the belting operation (different abrasive type, faster or slower belt speed etc.), or is the problem related more to the quality of the brass material?

John Kostura
Captive shop employee - Santa Ana, California, USA



First of two simultaneous responses --

240 grit is pretty rough, and I'm not surprised that you get splinters. If you can use a finer grit, that would help. Also try being less aggressive, remove material more slowly. Reduce belt pressure and possibly speed.

jeffrey holmes
Jeffrey Holmes, CEF
Spartanburg, South Carolina
June 30, 2009



Second of two simultaneous responses --

My GUESS is that the small lead particles in the leaded 360 brass are what's giving you the slivers. If so, changing to another brass alloy without lead or similar free machining additive would eliminate the problem. If my company had the problem, I'd use our SEM to substantiate this guess. There are a lot of commercial laboratories with scanning electron microscopes in the Southern California area, so it wouldn't be difficult for you either.

If that isn't the cause, I can't think of anything else obvious.

Good luck!

lee gearhart
Lee Gearhart
metallurgist - E. Aurora, New York
July 1, 2009




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"