As a member of the eBay Partner Network & Amazon Affiliate we receive compensation for qualifying purchases

Home /
T.O.C.
FAQs
 
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
Here
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Search 🔍
the Site
pub Where the world gathers for
plating, anodizing, & finishing Q&As since 1989





-----

Quantifying the effectiveness of scale removal




We run a metal coating process. Part of our process is scale removal. I am trying to optimize the scale removal process. How can I quantify the effectiveness of(or lack of) scale removal?

Ralph R Palumbo
Automotive Part supplier - South Haven, Michigan
November 18, 2008



Hi, Ralph. I've never heard it expressed that way, although it doesn't sound unreasonable. Still, when you look at the surface, the part is suitable for its intended purpose (which is subsequent coating) or it isn't, so maybe that's a start. For example, parts need to be completely free of scale for electroplating and certain chemical displacement reactions.

Perhaps another possibility is a weight comparison between your chemically descaled parts and a sandblasted part to some particular sandblast specification.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
November 19, 2008


Ralph, Ted has made a good suggestion in using a "sandblast" specification; Namely a test for blasting intensity is the "Almen Test Strip". These strips are a means to measure compressive stress induced into surface of components, or in your application cleaning intensity. If you blast an Almen Strip, which can be affixed to raw part; then blasted into a "good part", the defection of the strip could be used to quantify the cleaning process. You should contact a supplier of Almen strips to see if they could help you run this experiment with you. Regards,

Tim Deakin
North Tonawanda, New York
November 22, 2008



The SSPC (Steel Structures Painting Council) and the NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers) both have scales for evaluating the surfaces of substrates. Check out their web sites. For example, SSPC 8 is pickled. I don't think that there are any better references for what you seek. In my humble opinion, there are only three possible grades: (1) underpickled; there is still residual oxide on the surface; (2) pickled correctly; and (3) overpickled; there has been so much pickling done that the carbon and silicon on the surface interfere with subsequent processing.

tom_rochester
Tom Rochester
CTO - Jackson, Michigan, USA
Plating Systems & Technologies, Inc.
supporting advertiser
plating systems & technologies banner ad
November 25, 2008




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"