finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedAdvertiseForum
topic 4981

Sealing anodized Aluminum


(2000)

Q. Hi. We have some parts that we send out for anodizing per Mil-A-8625 [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.mil]. They are also required to be sealed. Exactly what does the sealing process do for the product?

Also what is the best way to check to determine if the parts were properly sealed? Is there an in house test that we can perform? Right now we introduce a dye to the surface of the part and after a minute or so we wipe it off with a wet rag. If the part is properly sealed the dye should come off without a trace.

Thank you for your time and I hope to hear from you with your input. Stan Kmiecik

Stan Kmiecik
- Addison, Illinois USA


(2000)

A. Stan, Essentially sealing is an hydration of the Aluminium oxide. The best test you could is to dissolve a dark dye in oleic acid (the same present on your finger) and put a drop of it onto the anodised surface and remove it with a shower tap. You can graduate the effects of greasing letting a drop for 1 minute, another 2 minute, etc. So you can measure the undesired oleophilic properties of oxide.

In my field (printing) we apply an offset ink (very thick one). If a shower tap removes easily the ink layer, sealing is O.K. I hope my explanation (and my English) is O.K.

Bye Francesco

Francesco Cicchetti
Francesco Cicchetti
- Sulmona, Italy


(2000)

A. The anodize coating is porous. Sealing chemically closes up the pores to keep out corrosion-causing chemicals. There is an ASTM test, ASTM B136-84 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] , which is similar to the dye test you are running, except a 50:50 nitric acid solution is applied to a flat surface for 2 min., washed off, then a dye solution is applied for 5 minutes, then washed off.The test even allows you to rub the surface with Pumice [linked by editor to product info at Amazon] . If there is any stain from the dye, the part is considered inadequately sealed. It is not a good test for heavily etched surfaces.

Those who are more serious about seal testing perform a weight-loss test, per ASTM B680 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] . A panel or part is soaked in a chromic/phosphoric acid solution for 15 minutes at 100 °F. IF the panel or part is sealed, there is little or no weight loss. If it is unsealed, almost the whole coating will dissolve. It is a much better test, because the degree of sealing is quantified. As it can be a destructive test, you should have panels processed with the parts to!do it. Neither of these tests are very easy to pass if the parts are high copper alloys.

If you truly need to meet the requirements of MIL-A-8625, the only real criterion you need to worry about is passing 336-hour salt spray- poorly sealed parts will not pass, well sealed parts will. I have seen 2024 parts fail the dye stain test miserably but pass the 336-hour salt spray test. Of course, the problem with the salt spray test is that it takes two weeks to run.

phil johnson

Phil Johnson
- Madison Heights, Michigan



November 4, 2011

Q. Anodic Coating as a dielectric has random dielectric breakdown performance when the probe size is increased. Suspect the trapped air breaks down randomly. I am looking at ways to seal or eliminate the porosity. The end application is an electronic circuit board with breakdown capability up to 4000V. Can somebody recommend the right approach to sealing the pores with no trapped air within the dielectric structure.

Kuang Tan
Integrator - Penang, Malaysia

November 9, 2011

Q. For our application, we need complete pores sealing, ie, sealant must penetrate down to the barrier layer. Any trapped pocket of air can be an initiation point for electrical breakdown. The air inside the pores will breakdown when high electric field is applied onto the aluminum plate and the oxide. In our structure, the oxide thickness is 25um. The pores are in the nanometer range. We manage to do partial sealing; however, this is not good enough. The way we test is cross sectioning the oxide and look for the sealant.

I look forward to more suggestions. Thanks.

Kuang Tan [returning]
- Penang, Malaysia



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView This Week's HOT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.