No registration or passwords; no pop-up ads -- just aloha, fun, & answers.
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate earns from qualifying purchases).
Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
 
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

Reducing chloride level in electroforming by high current treatment




We are running a fairly standard sulfamate nickel electroforming operation but have concerns about residual stress and pitting. A recent bath analysis showed 42 g/l chloride which I realize is quite high. We have heard that running this bath at very high current (no parts, just dummy electrodes) for several hours can bring the chloride level down. Is there any truth to this?

Ken Holko
Engineer - San Diego, California, USA
2007



The discharge of chlorine at the anode is not the preferred anodic reaction, so it is unlikely that it will significantly reduce the chloride concentration. There is a chance you may slightly reduce the concnetration if you use inert anodes (or passivate the nickel), but the dominant reaction will be the release of oxygen. Your chloride level is much too high for stress free or low stress nickel deposits. In theory you don't need any chloride for sulphamate nickel as long as you use S-nickel rounds as the anode. In practise, most electroformers use 10g/l or less nickel chloride. I would recommend you aim at very low levels, say about 5g/l. However, I must ask, how did the chloride level get so high - I would strongly recommend you solve that problem and ensure it doesn't happen again. Removal of chloride is not easy; it can be done by selective preciptation, but you run the risk of contaminating the bath with another cation, so I would recommend you dump the bath or at least remake it and slowly use this bath as a chloride top-up system for the new bath. Alternatively, you can add stress reducers to the bath, but these tend to be quite expensive and can cause other problems - talk to your chemical supplier about what options they may have. Good luck.

trevor crichton
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist
Chesham, Bucks, UK
2007




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"