No registration or passwords; no pop-up ads -- just aloha, fun, & answers.
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate earns from qualifying purchases).
Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
 
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

How can I measure Fe in cleaning/acid tanks w/o an AA unit?




How can I measure Fe+++ in the cleaner tanks, especially in acid tank other than AA procedure.

Mortez Aghaebrahim
Plating lab manager - Richmond,VA, USA
2007


AAS [on eBay or Amazon] will necessarily give you the total of Fe++ and Fe+++. If you know that there is no Fe++ in your solution, that's fine. But if there's Fe++ as well as Fe+++, then AAS cannot separate the oxidation states and you would be reading the total of Fe++ and Fe+++. To separate them, you need to use some wet chemistry.

Option 1
If there is no Fe++ in the solution, so that all the iron is present as Fe+++, you can use AAS or you can do it in one chemical determination which uses preliminary reduction of the Fe+++ to Fe++ then titration with potassium dichromate to quantitatively oxidise the Fe++ to Fe+++.

If there IS any Fe++ in the solution and you want the Fe+++ only, you need two separate determinations, one that gives you total Fe (i.e. Fe++ plus Fe+++) and one that gives you Fe++ only. The first is the same as outlined in the first paragraph above, and the second is a direct titration without the preliminary reduction. Simple subtraction then tells you the original Fe+++ content.

The procedure is simple enough to do for anybody with basic lab skills and apparatus, but the written description of the procedure is quite lengthy.

Option 2
Although an unorthodox procedure, it would be possible to use careful adjustment of the pH of the test solution to precipitate the Fe+++ as ferric hydroxide without precipitating the ferrous ion, then filtering off the ferric hydroxide and redissolving it in acid to give a test solution whose total Fe content is in fact only the Fe+++ from the original test solution. That could then be analysed for Fe by AAS and the result would be the Fe+++ content of the original. But given that there is a bit of wet chemistry in doing that, it would I think be easier to instead do the bit of wet chemistry required for the potassium dichromate procedures.

Bill Reynolds
Bill Reynolds [deceased]
consultant metallurgist - Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
We sadly relate the news that Bill passed away on Jan. 29, 2010.




2007

Sir:
Some acids like sulfuric and hydrochloric are "reducing" acids and dissolved iron is in the reduced state (lower oxidation number of +2). Other acids like nitric acid are oxidizing acids and dissolved iron is in the oxidized state of +3.
If you could state which acid is being used, then a test method may be determined.
For a reducing acid simple dropper bottle testing using potassium dichromate (hex chrome) is very easy and quick.
Regards,

Dr. Thomas H. Cook
Galvanizing Consultant - Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA



This question comes up on a regular basis. My suggestion is to add an excess of EDTA under acid conditions, then bring to pH 10 with aqua ammonia [on eBay or Amazon] and back titrate to a blue Eriochrome Black T [affil links] endpoint with a standard Zn or Mn solution. Then, it doesn't matter what oxidation state the Fe is in. The EDTA/Fe complex is 1:1 on a molar basis either way.

dave wichern
Dave Wichern
Consultant - The Bronx, New York
2007



Dave, for determination of total iron, your procedure is certainly an alternative to my recommendation of prior reduction to Fe++ then titration with dichromate.

However, the original post requested a procedure for determining Fe+++ and that is the request that I addressed.

The original post gives no information about the test solution that could tell us whether or not any Fe++ is present, but the fact that Mortez specifically refers to Fe+++ suggests that both oxidation states are present in the solution - if he wanted total Fe he would probably have said so. With both oxidation states present, determination of Fe+++ must be done by determining total Fe, and separately determining Fe++, and then subtracting Fe++ from total Fe to give Fe+++

Since a dichromate titation is necessary for Fe++ in the presence of Fe+++ it seems to me more sensible and convenient and cost effective to use that same titrant and indicator combination for the total Fe as well.

Bill Reynolds
Bill Reynolds [deceased]
consultant metallurgist - Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
We sadly relate the news that Bill passed away on Jan. 29, 2010.

2007




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"