Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no registration, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

I need salt spray data for MIL-A-8625F for all types





My customer is concerned with airborne contaminants that may reduce the performance of the finish, although he is specifying MIL-A-8625F type II with a powdercoat on top he is still concerned with the performance, especially salt spray. Does anyone have data for this?

My customer is also concerned with the Telecom standard GR-487 which calls out and environment of about 15 airborne contaminants and also concerned with any other contaminants. This application is for the traffic cabinet industry.

I am thinking of suggesting going with type III hard anodize just to eliminate the concern about the performance/wear. Should I specify with or without the seal?

One last question - how soon after applying the anodic coating do you suggest we should be powdercoating? The reason I ask this is that I don't have any source that anodizes and applies powder. I'm wondering if this will be an issue. We can probably ensure they get painted within 48 hours - is this soon enough?

Any comments/suggestions would be very welcome.

Martin Magaña
Quality Assurance Manager - Anaheim, California, USA
2007



Interesting question and probably too large for posting here to get a full response but here goes. Mil spec MIL-A-8625 requires chromic (Type I) and sulfuric (Type II) SEALED anodic films to pass 336 hours of salt spray performed on a monthly basis as a process control test. Hardcoat on the other hand has no such requirement as it is generally intended for wear applications and is seldom sealed. When it is sealed, it exhibits even far greater corrosion resistance. If you're sold on powder coating following anodize, you should be cautioned that some of the anodize seals, such as nickel acetate and sodium dichromate for example, have a negative impact on paint adhesion. For this reason many aerospace firms require use of dilute seals so that they can subsequently bond them with maximum T-peel strength.

milt stevenson jr.
Milt Stevenson, Jr.
Syracuse, New York
2007




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"