finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
current topics
Live! From Pine Beach NJ: The world's most popular metal finishing website, and the internet's friendliest corner

topic 45031

RoHS compliant tin/lead plating



A discussion started in 2002 and continuing to 2007.
Add your Q. or A. to restore it to 2019's "Current Topics" discussions.

2002

Q. Tin-lead alloys were used as contact finishes before. It seems that nowadays, contact finishes are almost noble metals. Are there any tin-lead plated connectors in manufacturing and in use? If so, could you give me some real examples? And how big is the market share? Since lead-free solder is expected to replace tin-lead solder in electronic industry, will this affect the field of connectors?

Ji Wu
- College Park, Maryland, USA


2007

Q. Is tin/lead plating (maximum 97% tin and 3% minimum lead) RoHS compliant?

Jim Dawson
plating & finishing is a process within our manufacturing facility - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA


2007

A. I'm working very hard on understanding this. I'm still not there. I see your letter has gone unanswered for a while, so I'll run this up the flagpole...and see who shoots it full of holes. Take what I say with a grain of salt.

The rule is, as far as I can understand, that not more than 0.1% of any "homogenous" part can consist of lead. A plated coating is not considered "homogenous" in that it's not something you can unscrew - it's part of the metal.

So, I suppose you would determine the thickness of the coating, the density of the alloy, then, the surface area of the part. Now, you have the weight of the coating...multiply by 0.03, now, you have the weight of the lead.

Now, weigh the whole component, and divide the weight of the lead by that weight. If the number is less than 0.001, it's compliant. If it's greater, it's not. That is what I think it all means, anyway.

There are numerous exemptions. They are also still arguing about what's "homogenous."

dave wichern
Dave Wichern
Consultant - The Bronx, New York


2007

A. Dave, that seems a long way of saying 3% lead exceeds 0.1% lead so non-RoHS.

Jim, there are exemptions to the 0.1% lead limit, but probably none applies. See the Global Automotive Declarable Substance List (GADSL), which includes both RoHS & ELV, at http://www.gadsl.org
Exemptions include free-machining alloys and critical electronics applications in aerospace and computers. Some exemptions are being phased out as replacements are developed. Intel uses a 5% Pb solder on present CPU chips but has announced next generation, 0.45 nm chips will use a new, Pb-free solder.

Ken Vlach
- Goleta, California
contributor of the year

Finishing.com honored Ken for his countless carefully
researched responses. He passed away May 14, 2015.
Rest in peace, Ken. Thank you for your hard work
which the finishing world continues to benefit from.



2007

A. Not only was it long, Ken, it was wrong.

Apparently plated coatings are considered to be a "homogenous" part, because they can be physically separated from the substrate. So, the answer to the original posters question is pretty definitely 'no', unless it falls under one of those exemptions.

dave wichern
Dave Wichern
Consultant - The Bronx, New York

Lead-free Solder Interconnect Reliability
from Abe Books

or

2007

A. Hello Ji. The reason most contact materials may be noble metals today is that electronics continue to grow smaller, lower power, and more critical. The thing is: tin-lead plating, tin plating, nickel plating, and all the non-noble metals tarnish -- they grow non-conductive or marginally conductive oxide layers which interfere with conductivity. The amount of resistance wasn't an issue in many of the circuits of 50 years ago, but is today. Noble metals don't tarnish and are more appropriate for low power digital signals.

thumbs up sign Hi, Dave. No one can possibly fault you for your difficulty in accepting the European Parliament's ridiculous definition of the word "homogeneous" :-)

The goals of RoHS and related restrictions are obvious and probably admirable, but getting there has involved really weird definitions of words, to wit, a chromate conversion coating that can be easily rubbed off the plating by a child with a pencil eraser is considered "homogeneous" with the plating (inseparable from it), but the plating layer which can't be removed by a trained machinist with a factory full of machine tools is considered to be "not homogeneous" with the substrate :-)

Basically, they want people to stop using lead and hexavalent chromium, and it may be best if we just ask Ji and Jim to simply accept that -- because they will probably continue to twist words as necessary to achieve that end :-)

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E.
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"


Can Alodine work over Tin-Lead Plating?

June 6, 2019

Q. I have a question regarding the Tin-lead plating process. Currently, at our facility, a drawing calls for a tin-lead finishing (75-95% tin). For some reasons we are not using this process on depot, and the shop is Alodining instead.

My question to you is, might there be any negative interaction between Alodine over tin-lead plating? Please advise.

Lisa Elias
- Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, USA


June 2019

A. Hi Lisa. I am not understanding the word 'depot' in this context. Was it perhaps a spell-check replacement for "deposit" or "the part"?

"Alodine" is a Henkel trade name for chromate conversion coatings and non-chromate post treatments on (to my understanding) aluminum, and on cadmium and zinc plating. Post treatments of similar sorts have been used on tin-lead plating as a tarnish inhibitor, so I would say there will be no negative interaction.

But I have to admit that I don't understand the question -- I don't know the substrate material, whether "Alodine" enhances that surface or not, or whether it is even remotely satisfactory to call tin-lead plating and Alodine conversion coating 'equivalent' or 'satisfactory' for your application.

Regards,

pic of Ted Mooney
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey
Striving to live "Aloha"



If you have a question in mind which seems off topic, please Search the Site

ADD a Q, A, or Comment on THIS topic START an UNRELATED topicView CURRENT HOT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2019 finishing.com, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About finishing.com   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.