Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no registration, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

Painting over galvanised surface




We are having a job where the specification demanded a galvanising deposition of 275 gm/m^2. The manufactures mill test certifies the deposition, but when tested in independent lab, the result says the deposition is 170 gm/m^2 i.e. 25 to 30 micron tk. Is there any way to make it up by painting over it?

Goutom Bandyopadhyay
- Doha, Qatar
2006



2006

Making up the thickness of galvanizing by painting is a problem.
First, if your spec is for galv and you supply paint, you are not supplying to spec. Next is performance: Galv and paint perform differently.

If your customer has set a spec, its for a reason:
1. They need that spec (in which case supplying something else might be a problem)
2. They didn't know what to specify and chose that spec almost by default. (in which case they might be able to "make do" with your proposed alternative)

geoff_crowley
Geoff Crowley
Crithwood Ltd.
Westfield, Scotland, UK
crithwood logo



2006

Goutom:
When I first read your question I passed it up too quickly. Is the product general work or is it sheet? Sheet could be about any thickness but I have never seen lower than about 50 microns on general work (e.g. galvanized after fabrication). Thus if this is general work then the independent lab must be wrong and got a thickness that is lower than reality.
Regards,

Dr. Thomas H. Cook
Galvanizing Consultant - Hot Springs, South Dakota, USA



2006

It is conceivable to get 25-30 you thickness on material like 6 mm thick. There are techniques to get coating thicknesses down to this. We used to do a run of pipe for a customer who wanted not more than 40 u. Wall thickness 4.5 mm, diameter 50 mm, mild carbon steel pipe.

But thicknesses below 50 you are not common as said above, and an error could have been made.

geoff_crowley
Geoff Crowley
Crithwood Ltd.
Westfield, Scotland, UK
crithwood logo


Unfortunately the lab made a mistake, the obtained coating was 340 micron but reported half of that. Problem was solved.

Goutom Bandyopadhyay
- Doha, Qatar
April 7, 2009


none
adv.
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"