Authoritative Answers, Fun, & Aloha -- no cost, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub     mobile?
Metal finishing Q&As since 1989

-----

I Need Concrete "Cons" to Nitric 1 Passivation with Sodium Bichromate. Please Help!




At this time our Passivation shop uses these methods according to ASTM A967. Nitric 2-5, and also citric acid passivation. It has been proposed that we add Nitric 1 as a service. I am nervous about this. I would like to hear pro's and con's.. to be honest, mostly cons about this method. I appreciate your help!

Faith R. Starks

2006



The biggest con is that it introduces another source of hex-chrome into your process: given the fact that OSHA is getting pretty harsh on hex-chrome, the profit potential would have to be pretty huge to make it worthwhile. The second biggest con is that it is more complex to maintain because of the mix of chemicals.

Jim Gorsich
Compton, California, USA
2006



With the proper citric based procedures, you shouldn't need nitric baths at all to passivate anything you need to. Adding another nitric bath would just be redundant.

ray kremer
Ray Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner
2006


Also look at the health issues with Sodium Dichromate. Look up the MSDS and then decide if it is worth it. Check out using copper sulphate [this product on eBay or Amazon affil links] instead. You may need to do some homework but it may be worth while for you... You also stand the chance of not being RoHS compliant as well.

Kevin W. Gallich

2006



Thanks, Kevin, but what are you referring to in mentioning copper sulphate? Surely you can't passivate stainless steel with it?

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2006


Some AMS specs let you use copper sulphate instead of Sodium Dichromate. It is not a replacement in ASTM A967 but maybe if they do their homework they could get away with using AMS2700B instead. Just a thought from me.

Kevin W. Gallich

2006


none
www.finishing.com is made possible by supporting advertisers ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages



(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"