No passwords, no registration, no paywalls, no popups, no AI

As an Amazon Associate & eBay Partner we earn from affil links

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
SITE
NEWS
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry Search our quarter-million Q&As

Home of the finishing HOTLINE since 1989

-----

RoHS compliance of galvanized finishes




Is Galvanealed and Galvanized RoHS compliant?

David Dezse
- Lewis Center, Ohio
2006


My understanding is that the organics on the RoHS list are not an issue with inorganic finishes, leaving only the metals cadmium, mercury, and lead, and the hexavalent form of chromium. Although you might need to check for the amount of contamination with cadmium, mercury, or lead, the only RoHS metal that I think is there by design is chromium, which is used to brighten galvanizing and deter white rusting. I think you need to specify that the galvanizing be free of hexavalent chromium and RoHS complaint

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha

finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey

Need quick confidential answers? $25
Need project assistance? $100/hr.


THE AMERICAN GALVANIZERS ASSOCIATION IS ON RECORD AS SAYING THAT HEX CHROME TREATED GALVANIZING IS RoHS COMPLIANT . I AM CONFUSED...IS IT OR ISN'T IT?

DAVID S WARE
- Chattanooga, Tennessee


? Can you give us a link where they say this for the record, David?

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha

finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey

Need quick confidential answers? $25
Need project assistance? $100/hr.



... and a few days go by and . . .

David copied us on a private letter from the AGA, as well as an AGA white paper and a European General Galvanizers Association (EGGA) white paper. Yes, AGA is apparently claiming that chromate quenched galvanizing is RoHS compliant and it looks like the European General Galvanizers Association asserts pretty much the same opinion. With the deadline less than 2 months away, we would hope that some official European Parliament tribunal would be issuing a non-ambiguous statement on this specific issue, but the wheels of bureaucracy turn slowly on both sides of the Atlantic. It looks like billions of dollars may be wasted before they give an interpretation -- and then tell us it was impossible to read it any other way  🙂

Meanwhile I don't know if anyone can afford to change if the major associations are telling your competitors that they don't need to invest the resources to change. It's a thorny one. -- Ted.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha

finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey

Need quick confidential answers? $25
Need project assistance? $100/hr.


none
adv.
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Sorry! Finishing.com is temporarily Read-Only.
Ted Mooney is retiring but I have several offers to take it over.
We're working hard to make sure we find it the best new home.



Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

Finishing
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g,
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2026 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"