Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no registration, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

Recommended plating for automotive connectors




2006

Hello everybody,

I am interested in getting recommendations with respect to the following topic: for a new client we intend to make automotive devices which have also an electrical connector. Our customer is trying to push us go down with our price(who doesn't these days?), and we want to look at other plating options.

Have you encountered during your experience of working with these processes such a thing as 'recommended/not recommended/not allowed' combinations of platings?

Thanks in advance,

Leo Lajo
automotive parts maker - Apeldoorn, The Netherlands



Please start with what plating combination you are using now, Leo. Readers don't like to spend a lot of their time making a detailed suggestion only to have it instantly dismissed as "that's what we already do". Also, it's difficult to suggest anything without knowing any details of exposure, voltage levels, current, etc. For example, there are connector materials like electroless nickel and tin which may be fine for most applications but won't be acceptable for very low signal levels where only precious metals will do. Good luck.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2006



2006

Ted, thanks for the recommandations. Indeed we are talking about very low voltage levels (up to 5V). Obviously the best solution is Au(connector)/Au(counter-connector), but as well we have seen Ag/Ag as being a functional combination. At the contact point between connector and counter-connector there is a gasket isolating the respective space and the temperature range is -30/140 °C.

Also, do you think mixed combinations (Ag/Au) or partial plating could work ?

Thanks in advance,
Leo

Leo Lajo
- Apeldoorn, The Netherlands



I'm not actually a connector expert, Leo. I was trying, as the site administrator, to clarify the question to facilitate getting it answered by someone who is. The temperature range may rule out tin, but electroless nickel sounds possible.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2006



First of two simultaneous responses -- 2006

A variety of plating options are available for connectors, namely, hard gold, Pd-Ni, Gold flash/Pd-Ni, Rh, Ag, Ni, electroless Ni, Sn and Sn-Pb alloys. It is not possible to give a detailed account here.

Noble metal plating could be the wise choice in many instances. If your customer is pushing you to go down with the price ¯ you can use tin plating. But tin plated connectors are susceptible for fretting corrosion and they are not suitable for high temperature applications. The tin plated connectors used in engine hood could experience up to 155C and under such conditions they fail very quickly.

Pd-Co alloy plating is one of the latest developments in the finishing of electrical connector contacts.

Lubrication could improve the service life of all plated connector contacts by several folds.

If you need more details, please refer the following:

Robert S. Mroczkowski, "Electronic Connector Handbook: Theory and Applications", McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998,
Chapter 3, pp. 3.1-3.49.

Morton Antler, "Materials, Coatings and Platings", in Electrical Contacts: Principles and Applications P.G. Slade (Ed.), Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1999, Chapter 7,
pp. 403-432.

Plenty of papers published in IEEE Journals: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/

T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan
T.S.N. Sankara Narayanan
- Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
(ed.note Nov. 2017: The good doctor has a fascinating blog at https://advancementinscience.wordpress.com)



Second of two simultaneous responses --

I would suggest looking into gold over mid phos EN. The thickness of each would be a factor of necessary conductivity and wear resistance. Any reduction in gold thickness would have cost savings but they would have to be significant enough to outweigh the additional manufacturing cost.

Gene Packman
process supplier - Great Neck, New York
2006




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"