Aloha, fun & authoritative answers -- no cost, no registration, no passwords, no popups
(as an eBay Partner & Amazon Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases)

Home /
T.O.C.
Fun
FAQs
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Adver-
tise
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Site 🔍
Search
pub  Where the
world gathers for metal finishing
Q&As since 1989



-----

Regeneration of ion exchange units




I am actually thinking about rinsing my ion-exchange units, after HCl/NaOH injection in a counter current direction. Will this help in improving the efficiency of my units, if yes how?

Ravikumar Abbigeri
Engineer - India
2005



Unless I am misunderstanding, this is called "backwashing". I think if you google with that term it will be explained.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
2005



Ted is correct. Backwashing (which some people confuse with regeneration) is always done in the reverse direction from the service flow. It serves to mix up the resin, which tends to start sorting itself by particle size during service, and to remove trash, dirt, etc. that tends to deposit on top of the resin bed.

A backwash step should be part of the regeneration cycle - that's standard practice, as far as I know.

dave wichern
Dave Wichern
Consultant - The Bronx, New York
2005



Not if your doing a counterflow regeneration, its not, or if you have adequate pre-filtration - down to 0.5 to 1 micron before the IX system. That can eliminate a significant amount of water created in the regeneration cycle. He might be discussing using incorrect terminology a counterflow regeneration process, which would improve the efficiency of the regeneration process and the quality of the effluent produced. Too many variables to consider here, with not enough information!

tom baker
Tom Baker
wastewater treatment specialist - Warminster, Pennsylvania
2005


 


Thanks, I stand corrected. My knowledge of ion exchange processes is a little dated. But, backwashing used to be standard practice, in so far as I understand, because the regenerant flow rate was insufficient to "fluff" the resin. If I may ask, what changed?

dave wichern
Dave Wichern
Consultant - The Bronx, New York
2005




(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact  -  Privacy Policy  -  ©1995-2024 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA  -  about "affil links"