netneut
finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing


Finishing.com has been free for 22 years,
but without net neutrality we could soon
cease to exist. Do us a solid, click on
the banner, and contact congress today!
HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedAdvertiseForum
topic 33579

Are passivation test kits gimmicks?

adv.    koslow passivation test kit

(2004)

Has anyone ever heard of or used a passivation testing kit? Supposedly it's supposed to eliminate all the other testing of passivation (humidity, salt fog, Cu sulfate, ferricyanic) and is approved by the federal method QQ-P-35C [link is to free spec at Defense Logistics Agency, dla.mil]. I was just wondering if it was just another gimmick.

Delia Heffernan
plating shop - Lenexa, Kansas, USA


(2005)

Which kits are you referring to? I have a Koslow tester and if you understand passivation, it is an effective tool.

I find passivation is much more than a yes/no proposition. There are degrees of passivation. The trick is to match the level of passivation to the corrosive environment. For example, mechanical polishing of the HAZ of welds is sufficient for many industrial applications. For more corrosive environments (even in the same plant), a subsequent citric passivation is required. In some instances, the condition may require full electropolishing as premium passivation.

The chrome oxide film wants to reach a state of equilibrium. One metallurgist told me stainless steel is either becoming more passive or less passive. A Koslow tester will indicate those trends. His explanation was a bit deeper than I could really get my arms around, but it made sense.

Do you have other passivation testers available? I've heard of other proprietary passivation testers being developed but am only familiar with the Koslow device available commercially.

Beyond kits, we have ASTM recognized test methods such as copper sulfate and ferroxyl. I like copper sulfate best as the ferroxyl seems much more touchy based on the application.

I hope this helps.

Todd Turner
- Monroe, Louisiana


(2005)

Todd's answer is right on, but I would add one additional item for consideration. None of these tests is any true measure of passivation. The passivation kit testers, like Koslow's, and the ASTM test methods like the ferroxyl and copper sulfate tests, only test for the presence of ferrous surface contamination. They provide no indication of the soundness of a passive surface film on the stainless steel. The humidity and salt fog tests will provide some qualitative indication of true passivity.

IMHO, the Koslow tester is a nice tool for quick evaluation of ferrous surface contamination. Faster and easier than the ferroxyl and copper sulfate tests, but no more effective.

larry hanke
Larry Hanke
materials testing laboratory
Minneapolis, Minnesota




(2005)

I know of many tests for passivation that are being used in the industry, most of which are not formal tests in the standards. It is best to stick to the standard tests that you see in the ASTM or AMS standards.

There are some new passivation testers available in Europe that may be worth trying, but in general the "quick test" devices provide spotty results and can mislead you many times. This is why they have not been put in the standards. They are good for collecting comparative data maybe.

lee kremer
kremer signature
Lee Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner


April 22, 2010

The Koslow Tester not only detects the presence of surface free iron as does the ferroxyl test but also can detect if the invisible chrome oxide layer is in tact. We run the tester over all our stock.

Laurne Keane
- Tenafly New Jersey



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView This Week's HOT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.