finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing.
    no popups, no spam
HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
current topics
topic 13628

Passivating stainless steel causes loss of mirror polish


A discussion started in 2002 but continuing through 2018

(2002)

Q. We are manufacturing SS components. After polishing we get a almost mirror finish in barrel. However the problem is that we have to passivate the components now according to customers requirement. On passivating with HCl we find that the components lose polish. Obviously if we polish again then passivating it would not make sense. Can someone suggest how to retain the polish of the components with passivation.

A. Sal
- Gujrat, India


(2002)

A. Are you passivating (pickling) with HCl or HF? An HF pickling would etch the surface and ruin any polished appearance. But, I don't know if it is needed. Passivation generally calls for Nitric Acid (ASTM A380 [link is to the practice at TechStreet] ) or Citric Acid ( ASTM A967 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] ). Neither should significantly change the appearance of the stainless.

Nitric/HF is generally considered pickling rather than passivating. It is useful in removing the discoloration from the weld or heat affected zone. However, I prefer a mechanical cleaning of the weld zone followed by citric passivation as a safer alternative to using Nitric/HF. I have never heard of any one using HCl to passivate Stainless Steel. The Chlorides would cause more damage than good.

Good luck on your treatment of the metal.

Todd Turner
- Monroe, Louisiana


(2002)

A. When you passivate parts you should not change the surface condition. If material and process is correct, you stated using HCl for passivating, you might want to check you spec's. Most often Nitric acid or citric acid is used and citric acid only should be used when the verifying that there is no Iron on surface.

Chris Snyder
plater - Charlotte, North Carolina


(2002)

A. To the best of my knowledge Passivation of Stainless steel is performed with a nitric or Citric acid solution.HCL will definitely "etch" most Stainless and result in a duller appearance at best.

Bill Grayson
- Santa Cruz, California, USA


(2002)

A. You definitely cannot use HCl to passivate stainless steel. As stated above, this will harm the surface more than help it. You must use either nitric acid or citric acid formulations according to ASTM A967 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] .

lee kremer
kremer signature
Lee Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner


(2002)

Q. I made a mistake while typing. We passivate with Nitric Acid only and not HCl. The parts we passivate are used in spray guns or automotive applications. But on passivation we lose the mirror polish.

A Sal[returning]
- Mumbai, India


(2002)

A. Sounds like you need to clean or degrease your parts thoroughly before passivation, as any surface contaminants will react badly with nitric acid, and leave a dull appearance.

Good luck.

Jeff Swayze
- Kelowna, B.C., Canada



January 6, 2018

Q. If there was contamination during passivation leading to a patchy / dull finish, is there a way to put this right? We recently passivated with citric acid, according to ASTM A967 [link by ed. to spec at TechStreet] , but there are some patches which look cloudy. Could this also be from inadequate rinsing after passivation? Again, any way to fix?

Joseph Emans
brewery - Oakura, New Zealand


January 10, 2018

A. Joseph,
This is usually one of two things.

Less common, it is dried residue of the acid due to poor rinsing or rinsing with water that is far from clean enough. It's generally not very hard to get residue off, though.

More commonly, the surface has been etched. Can you tell me what grade of stainless these parts were, and the pH of your citric bath?

ray kremer
Ray Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
supporting advertiser
McHenry, Illinois
stellar solutions banner


January 11, 2018

Q. Thanks Ray,
The grade is 304.
pH was recorded as 1.77
Regards,
Joe.

Joseph Emans[returning]
- Oakura, New Zealand


January 18, 2018

A. Joseph,
I would not expect surface etching under those conditions, unless the steel is some out-of-spec garbage from China, etc.

I would start a fresh bath, just to make sure there isn't something in there that shouldn't be, check that your rinse tanks are good clean water, double check that what you're dealing with is not residue after all, and monitor things to see if was an isolated incident or if it happens again.

ray kremer
Ray Kremer
Stellar Solutions, Inc.
McHenry, Illinois



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Comment to THIS thread START a NEW threadView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2018 finishing.com, Inc., Pine Beach, NJ   -   About finishing.com   -  Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.