finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedAdvertiseForum
(current
topics)
topic 1086

Masking alternatives for blind areas


(1998)

I am running into problems replacing a vapor degreaser in an anodizing process. The solvent used previously was TCE, and the company has made a commitment to discontinuing its use. The major cleaning issue is removing a masking wax used in deep boar holes. We are currently exploring alternative cleaning equipment and chemistries. My question is this:

Is there another masking process that could be used for these blind areas which may be more easily removed by a soak and steam cleaning?

Thank you for any help with this matter.

Andrew Bray
- Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute


(1998)

I guess my first reaction would be to look for another solvent rather than to look for another masking material!

Because, first, in theory at least, it is possible to have a vapor degreasing process with no fugitive emission and no waste. Perhaps even the wax can be fully recycled. Second, even if the wax can't be recycled, isn't it a benign, natural, renewable resource? It strikes me that trying to find a substitute for wax may be to go in the wrong direction.

Third, the reasons vapor degreasing was used may be myriad and it is easy to miss one of them--

If water from aqueous cleaning remains in the hole, can it explode and kill people (as has happened in galvanizing plants)? Are we positive that there is no mixed metal reaction that can cause galvanic corrosion during aqueous cleaning? Will the aluminum anodized coating be compromised in an aqueous cleaning process? Can we confidently say that sediment landing in the hole during the aqueous cleaning process will not cause any future operational problems?

I understand that some solvents damage the ozone layer, some are dangerously narcotic, some are flammable, and some cause urban smog; we need to be cognizant of this and minimize/eliminate the problem. But vapor degreasing is one of the most efficient, and conservation-oriented cleaning technologies ever developed--the elegant solution. I would hate to see society apply an ideological, demonizing, approach that, in an attempt to eliminate the misapplications or wasteful applications, tosses out the baby with the bath solvent.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey


(1998)

You might try oxidative cleaning. When heated in air a hydrocarbon oil/wax will oxidize to CO2. This is what happens in a self-cleaning oven. What is left behind is any non-volatile residue - the amount of which is determined by the oil/wax. Gaseous cleaning has the advantage that it reaches all the "hideouts". Try it in your self-cleaning oven or heat in an air furnace to 300-350C for a period of time determined by the amount of material to be removed

Donald M. Mattox
Society of Vacuum Coaters
Albuquerque, New Mexico

Ed. note:
            Mr. Mattox is
            the author of -->




This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.