Home /
T.O.C.
FAQs
 
Good
Books
Ref.
Libr.
Advertise
Here
Help
Wanted
Current
Q&A's
Search 🔍
the Site

Problem? Solution? Chime right in!
(one of the world's very few 'no registration' sites)

-----

"Maintaining low contact resistance on zinc coated chassis"



Current question:

June 11, 2021

Q. GalXC vs. G90 or Galvannealed long term electrical conductivity for EMI?

We have found over years of radiated emissions (RF) testing that Galvannealed plating oxidizes and develops a non-electrically conductive layer over time. We switched to GalXC, and the propriety plating and have not had the conductivity problems since. Now, we can't get GalXC. Wondering if there is something else similar we could use. Also wondering about pure Zinc, like G90 and how it would oxidize. Does it develop the grey powdery finish similar to Galvannealed?

BRENT GALAS
- DENVER Colorado
^


June 15, 2021

Different coating weights - i.e., G30, G60, G90, etc, won't make any difference because the surfaces will be the same. The difference between ordinary galvanizing and GalXC is that the GalXC has a passivation applied to the surface to prevent premature oxidation of the zinc. I would guess that it is a trivalent passivate or a zinc phosphate; a little digging would tell you which. From there, you could find a local metal finisher that could apply the same passivation.

tom_rochester
Tom Rochester Plating Systems & Technologies, Inc.  


supporting advertiser
CTO - Jackson, Michigan, USA

plating systems & technologies banner ad
^




Closely related historical postings, oldest first:

1996

Q. I have a question about the use of Zinc plating on a steel chassis. How do you address oxidation of the Zinc plating when low skin resistance is a requirement? I would like to use a tin plated EMI gasket between two pieces of Zinc plated steel panels. What would you suggest to prevent a resistive buildup on the surface of the Zinc plating? Thanks for your time.

Michael Kinney
^


A. I don't know enough about EMI shielding to give a to-the-point answer, but chromates will do a good job of holding down the contact resistance (although they may not be affordable). You should pick a clear/blue one because thicker chromates do cause resistance. Tin is worse than zinc in the short term, but is better at low resistance in the long term. You might need a very specific computerized literature search to find quantitative data unless a reader here can offer you more than I can.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
^


1996

A. My experience is with chassis for electronic equipment. If the equipment is in an office environment the best finish on the zinc would be a clear chromate conversion coating. The thicker coatings, such as the yellow or black coatings are definitely more corrosion resistant, but unless your EMI gasket has points to dig through the coating they may not make a good ground contact even initially. If your gasket does dig through the oxide or you have lots of force and wiping, then they might work. My experience has all been in designs where we didn't have those features.

Janet Rice
^



September 9, 2013

Q. Would you please recommend the best and cheapest plating for a steel chassis that must be electrically conductive so that it passes ESD testing? The current design that I'm working on is too complicated for powder coating, which is what I normally use.

I've been told that bright tin, annealed plating is not good enough for passivation. Nickel is banned in some countries due to allergens. And clear zinc may reduce electrical conductivity too much.

Nickel-tin alloy plating has been suggested. But I can't find a local supplier that can do it.

If zinc plating is the answer, what specifications can I put on my drawings to ensure that electrical conductivity remains adequate?

Thank you.

Wilson Tejada
Mechanical Designer - Ajax, Ontario, Canada
^

none
finishing.com is made possible by ...
this text gets replaced with bannerText
spacer gets replaced with bannerImages

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread SEARCH for Threads about ... My Topic Not Found: Start NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories:

 
Jobshops
Capital
Equipment
Chemicals &
Consumables
Consult'g, Train'g
& Software


About/Contact    -    Privacy Policy    -    ©1995-2021 finishing.com, Pine Beach, New Jersey, USA