finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry

-----

Corrosion resistance : passivation vs electropolishing

I'm working with pharmaceutical companies and some of them are requesting that their 316L stainless steel replacement parts are to be electropolished AND passivated after. My understanding is that electropolishing alone is enough since in addition to the surface finishing improvement, you get the cleaning of impurities and the chromium oxide layer as with the passivation process. Therefore, passivation does not add any value. I'm I right?

Regards,

Eric Potvin
process engineer - Québec, Québec, Canada
April 5, 2008

Hi, Eric, that's a tough one. It has been traditionally stated in authoritative books that electropolishing is the best passivation method. But that was before the days of citric acid passivation,and some of its proponents claim that citric acid passivation can improve the corrosion resistance of electropolished parts. Ask them to send you an independent study proving it.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, P.E.
Striving to live Aloha
finishing.com - Pine Beach, New Jersey
Ted is available for instant help
or longer-term assistance.
April 8, 2008

(No "dead threads" here! If this page isn't currently on the Hotline your Q, A, or Comment will restore it)

Q, A, or Comment on THIS thread -or- Start a NEW Thread

Disclaimer: It's not possible to fully diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations might be harmful.

If you are seeking a product or service related to metal finishing, please check these Directories: