Summary for poly-ond vs armoloy Discussion
Poly-ond vs. Armoloy is discussed in the context of reducing friction and improving lubricity when feeding nickel plated CRS parts. Eugene Jackson asks which coating is better for the application. The only answer in the thread comes from an unnamed responder who says they are unfamiliar with Poly-ond and asks what it is, joking that it might be a plastic such as polypropylene or polyethylene. Based on that uncertainty, the responder suggests that any polyolefin might be acceptable, but says their preference would lean toward ordinary polyethylene rather than polypropylene. No direct comparison with Armoloy is provided, so the thread does not establish a definitive winner; it mainly reflects uncertainty and a tentative preference for PE if a plastic-based low-friction surface is being considered.
Q. How does Poly-ond compare to Armoloy for reduced coefficient of friction and lubricity. I want to know which one is better to use in feeding nickel plated CRS parts.
Eugene Jackson
Consumer products manufacturing plant – Lancaster, South Carolina
March 19, 2008
A. Hi Eugene,
Pardon my absolute ignorance (I was in the plastics fabricating field for a zillion years) but wot in der
hell is Poly-ond ? Polypropylene? Polyethylene?
I’d imagine that any Polyoelefin would be OK … but my preference would be towards ordinary Pe, not PP.
Cheers from White Rock where the sun always shines, even if it’s above the clouds.

Freeman Newton [deceased]
R.I.P. old friend (It is our sad duty to
advise that Freeman passed away 4/21/12)