finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

HomeFAQsSuggested
Books
Help
Wanteds
Advertise
on this site
FORUM
(current
topics)
topic 4487

Electroless Nickel delamination


(2000)

I have an EN plated aluminum part exposed to running DI water and have noticed a delamination of the nickel from the aluminum. Is this a typical result of exposing EN plated aluminum to DI water, or is it possibly just a bad plating job? If so, what could be the cause?

Is EN plated aluminum even an appropriate material for use with DI water? Is there a better treatment/coating for the aluminum, or should a different material entirely be used?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Brendan Bagwell
- Tucson, Arizona, USA


(2000)

Although aluminum is highly cathodic to EN, meaning that a breached coating would cause rapid corrosion of the substrate, the spec sounds okay to me. But the EN was not properly applied; plating is not supposed to peel.

Ted Mooney, finishing.com Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey


(2000)

Normally, EN is about as good as you will get for DI water if it is in the range of 2 meg ohm. Really pure water 15 - 18 meg ohm will attack nearly everything except teflon and similar products. It will even attack glass slightly.

If the EN had a poor zincate treatment, once the EN is breached, it will gradually flake off.

A thin EN coating, under 0.0015" has pores and the DI will gradually attack thru it.

For a critical component, I would spec that a EN strike(alkaline) be used before the EN and that there was a minimum time from zincate to strike to plate. No coffee breaks of potty breaks after the zincate until it is in the final EN tank.

I would also spec out an adhesion test to be run on scrap parts. The high temp bake would be appropriate, but will destroy the aluminum strength, so any of those parts would become scrap. No stripping and replating of test parts subjected to a high temp. False results. I would do the test in my own facility if at all possible. The clean cycle of a small electric oven is about the right temp, but is too long. You would have to prostitute the safety and oven life would suffer. A small muffle furnace might be adequate.

James Watts
- Navarre, Florida



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.