finishing.com -- The Home Page of the Finishing Industry
A website for Serious Education, promoting Aloha,
& the most FUN smiley you can have in metal finishing

HomeFAQsBooksHelpWantedAdvertiseForum
(current
topics)
topic 3623

How can I get 0.1 nm surface roughness on Si surface?


(1999)

Q. Dear Sir, I use single crystal silicon as substrate of laser mirror. I hope to get ultralow surface roughness. It is better at 0.1 nm. Could you tell me where I can buy suitable polishing materials or how I can get 0.1 nm surface roughness.Thank you.

Best regards

Sun Long
- Dalian Inst. of Chem. Physics - Dalian, China


i. Mr. Sun,

I do not think your requirement is realistic, as the size of an atom is in the range of 0.1 nm. In other words, even if you put all the atoms of a material on an exact plane regardless of crystal structure, you will at least get 0.1 nm surface roughness. The least surface roughness can be achieved by means of chemical mechanical polishing in semiconductor industry. This is a very hot area. Good luck.

Ling

Ling Hao
- Grand Rapids, Michigan


i. Ling is correct that a 0.1 nm surface roughness is state of the art in chemical-mechanical polishing. Wafer fabs spend millions for equipment and procedure development for this purpose. An RMS or Ra roughness of 0.3 to 0.5 nm is a typical goal for high-end polishing on silicon for sample analyzed in our lab.

larry hanke
Larry Hanke
materials testing laboratory
Minneapolis, Minnesota




(2001)

A. To polish silicon finer than .1nm surface roughness I would final polish on a 64 or 73 pitch lap. Use a colloidal silica that won't attack pitch such as Ultra-Sol 500S ND mixed 1/1 with de-ionized water. Keep pH up around 10-11.

Polishing pads don't bridge surface texture as well as a pitch lap will. You should be able to get your surface down to less than 5 angstroms RMS surface roughness using this process.

Robert Garfield
- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA


(1999)

Q. Interesting. We sell CMP stainless steel sheets with Ra rating of 0.667 microinch (measured by white light interference microscope, AFM, SEM, etc.).

How does 0.667 microinch compare to 0.3 to 0.5 nm?

Michael Liu Taylor
Michael Liu Taylor
   specialty stainless steel distributor
Dallas, Texas



A. Hi, Michael. Silicon wafers for laser mirrors must be far smoother than mirror polished stainless sheet. 0.667 microinch is 16.9 nanometers.

Regards,

Ted Mooney, finishing.com
Teds signature
Ted Mooney, P.E. RET
finishing.com
Pine Beach, New Jersey



March 19, 2012

Q. We have been trying to reach a roughness of under 0,4 nm. However, with the compounds at our disposal (Ultrasol 300), we can't seem to get under 0,4. We can get it slightly lower with softer pitch (22 to be exact), but that deteriorates the flatness way too much.
Is the difference between Ultrasol 500s and Ultrasol 300k that spectacular or is there something obvious we might be doing wrong?

Niels Wolters
- Oegstgeest, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


April 9, 2012

A. This does not answer your question directly. A mechanical surface finish is a direct result of pressure and abrasive. When I say abrasive, particle size and hardness are major factors. If you include lubricants, this could have an effect on how the abrasive performs. So you may want to look for a different size media or abrasive hardness, or you can play with the pressure.

tony kenton
AF Kenton
Nova Finishing Systems Inc.
Hatboro, Pennsylvania



May 1, 2012

thumbs up signThanks for the answer, more pressure seemed to do the trick.
Need to run some more tests to be sure, but I'm down to 0,4 0,5 nm at the moment.

Niels Wolters
- Oegstgeest, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands


May 31, 2012

A. This thread intrigues me. I know very little about the surface of silicon, but I do know that 0.1 nm is about the diameter of an atom, maybe even less than that, depending on the atom. Are we seriously talking about a surface where a couple of atoms out of place will put the surface out of specification? How do you measure these surfaces? I have used an AFM in my time, but do not consider it to be a piece of production control equipment.
If I am understanding the thread, once again, surface engineering is leading the way in surface sciences - we are now working at one thousandth the official definition of nanotechnology!
Maybe I need a course on silicon surface technology!

trevor crichton
Trevor Crichton
R&D practical scientist
Chesham, Bucks, UK



This public forum has 60,000 threads. If you have a question in mind which seems off topic to this thread, you might prefer to Search the Site

ADD a Q or A to THIS thread START a NEW THREADView CURRENT TOPICS

Disclaimer: It's not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author's employer. The internet is largely anonymous & unvetted; some names may be fictitious and some recommendations may be deliberately harmful.

  If you need a product/service, please check these Directories:

JobshopsCapital Equip. & Install'nChemicals & Consumables Consult'g, Train'g, SoftwareEnvironmental ComplianceTesting Svcs. & Devices


©1995-2017 finishing.com     -    Privacy Policy
How Google uses data when you visit this site.